Skip to comments.
Hugh Jackman Joins Anti-Gun, “Not One More” Campaign
gunssavelives.net ^
| 2/11/2015
| Dan Cannon
Posted on 02/11/2015 9:50:36 AM PST by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: rktman
He’s a fictional superhero. He doesn’t need guns.
To: rktman
Looks like they would instinctively know that when they come out ‘for’ or ‘against’ something, in today’s world, they alienate half of their prospective audience for any future movies or records.
Back in the old days, when studios had stables of actors under contract, they kept a tight rein on their ‘properties’ and no political or social activity was allowed, so as not to harm profits because of statements made by the actors under contract.............
22
posted on
02/11/2015 10:35:32 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: rktman
LOL, don’t worry he’s only an actor ,ROFL
23
posted on
02/11/2015 10:36:26 AM PST
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: rktman
--yep--disgusting--wonder why he was so willing to carry around that '95 Winchester carbine in The Australian--??
24
posted on
02/11/2015 10:47:19 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: rktman
I think we all have to stop obsessing over what these foreign actors like Hugh Jackman and Liam Neesam think. They are not American they can’t vote and they have no understanding of our Constitution. They just get caught up in the Hollyweird herd mentality and in their own countries they can’t have a gun. Who cares?
Now Sly Stallone has turned out to be a major disappointment. He should know better.
25
posted on
02/11/2015 12:27:49 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Any film star who cries a gun in a film, should be protested as a hypocrite. We should come up with a catchy name that smears them for their exploits with a weapon, while being a gun grabber in real life. With any luck, the crazed libs will do the dirty work for us. That should teach actors to stop spouting off such nonsense and mixing up young impressionable kids.
26
posted on
02/11/2015 1:05:26 PM PST
by
lulu16
(May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Neesam can vote. Not sure of the status of my fellow aussie here.
27
posted on
02/11/2015 1:11:41 PM PST
by
xp38
To: rktman
Sure glad I pirated all his movies.
28
posted on
02/11/2015 1:12:59 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
To: rktman
Hmmm,not one more. Do they mean not one more woman saved from rape or murder, or not one more family saved from a home invasion or not one more person save from a carjacking? No they mean not one more worthless, murderous criminal losing his life to a victim legallydefending themselves.
29
posted on
02/11/2015 1:31:13 PM PST
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: lulu16
The problem is most all of them are gun grabbers so you will have to stop going to the movies. I’m not ready to give them up.
30
posted on
02/11/2015 2:12:19 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: xp38
I did not realize Neesam had become a citizen. So now I have to lump him in with Sly Stallone. Major effing disappointments.
31
posted on
02/11/2015 2:14:39 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: lulu16
“Any film star who cries a gun in a film, should be protested as a hypocrite. We should come up with a catchy name that smears them for their exploits with a weapon, while being a gun grabber in real life.”
Howabout “AINO”? Actor In Name Only. Or “ANAL”? Actor Now A Loon.
32
posted on
02/11/2015 4:55:51 PM PST
by
Boomer
(Politically Incorrect and proud of it.)
To: rktman
This is HUGH. I am Series.
33
posted on
02/11/2015 4:58:25 PM PST
by
Rodamala
To: Georgia Girl 2
I think we should continue to point them out so we can be sure to avoid spending our money on their movies. Pretty sure the liberal pansies they're allying themselves with aren't the ones spending money on their shoot-em-up action films. I for one have no problem not paying money to watch their movies. As long as we keep them in the spotlight, plenty of others will find themselves equally compelled to boycott them.
34
posted on
02/11/2015 8:46:54 PM PST
by
RC one
(Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
35
posted on
02/12/2015 5:29:11 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary men)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson