'nuff said.
"This case is not about eugenics, this outcome has been driven by the bleak yet undisputed evidence that a further pregnancy would be a significantly life-threatening event."
Moral Absolutes Ping!
Freepmail Responsibility2nd or wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list. FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search [ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
CWII Spark Ping — While not a US story, can you imagine this being used as precedence in our courts?
(And, given that it’s a NHS ruling, can we discount the possibility that similar would be adopted by our own HHS via the ACA?)
Next step will be the ovens. It’s the way that German guy eased into it.
"Born in 1918, she was mentally impaired and never truly fit in with her family." - Schriver
Nice, huh?
Time to end our alliance with the UK. SICK COUNTRY
I think this is the first step to their mandatory Eugenics program. The elites are ready to start the programs up again for the “undesirables” (non-elites). An IQ of 70 is low, but she has the ability to think and make decisions. If the state would offer her money to go through some type of birth control, she would probably accept the offer. There’s all types of inducements that could be given this woman without requiring the court to mandate her sterilization. There is more and more talk about mandatory eugenics as the solution.
The doctor made the decision that the woman cannot bear the child to term. She will not live if she tries to have this baby. I am not a doctor. I think the doctor is trying to save the life of the mother.