that explanation also extends to U.S. liberals
“In Europe, it’s not a melting pot at all,” Kern told CNSNews.com. “Multiculturalism allows minority immigrant groups to set up their own societies and there’s no expectation of integration, of learning the language and of adapting to the legal system.
“In Britain, what you have now is a parallel system of more than 80 sharia courts that adjudicate all sorts of family law for Muslims. And under Islamic sharia law, women are not equal to men. So in a country where all people are supposed to be equal, you have a certain segment of society allowed to be treated as lesser individuals because they’re subjected to sharia law instead of the British Magna Carta.
“You also have the question of polygamy,” he continued. “It’s illegal in Germany and all the European countries, but exceptions are made for the Muslim communities. And what’s even more outrageous is that in the U.K., for example, the polygamists are able to collect social welfare benefits for all of their wives and all of the offspring of those wives. So you have one family of maybe 30 or 40 people all living off the state, even though it’s illegal. …
Progressives, Socialists, Radical Muslims United by their desire to cut off Adam Smith’s invisible hand.
Socialists are handicapped by their hopeless obtuseness as they “embrace the suck”.
Totally agree and it explains why two groups that should naturally hate each others seem to be allies.
Like the US and the Soviets uniting to defeat a perceived bigger enemy - the Nazis, so are the left and the muslims united to defeat their bigger enemy - western civilization.
Once they accomplish that them they will be at each other’s throat.
And I wouldn’t sell the left short against islam. They can be just as ruthless as the worst islamists.
Well, socialists, eventually they will come for you. What’cha gonna do then?
Success, however, is subversion's worst enemy. Where it succeeds in breaking down the parent society we have the French and the Russian revolutions and the succeeding suppression of free speech and totalitarian military dictatorships. Not, of course, what the old-school revolutionaries were actually after but mostly they're dead by then anyway (e.g. Marat, Robespierre, and Trotsky). Those who are left to deal with it tend to curse their irresponsible progenitors. Leftism in its current manifestation of multiculturalism is profoundly irresponsible, stubborn, dogmatic, and utterly blind to the impending consequences.
But it's all about the destruction of the status quo and a vision of what follows that never materializes. The Muslim track record of this is actually considerably better than that of the Western left - at least it actually has formed more or less stable societies, however vicious and oppressive they turned out to be to individual freedom. The Left has never even managed that.
This is an alliance that will do very well here in the US. I look for this to gain a lot of momentum. I pray that not one Jew or Christian will decide to take them on in a bizarre and stupid event that will cause the public to demand that all the rest of us be rounded up and incarcerated fro the public good. With constant media swipes against us that we are no better than the Nazis, or are in fact, worse than the Nazis, it would not take much to fuel this kind of public reaction. The public has been primed for it. Dumbed down, misinformed, brainwashed...etc. We are ripe for such a situation. Let’s pray that God intervenes before we reach the point of this happening, that Obama and his ilk are removed from office soon, and that in the process a lot of people wake from this stupor.
no kidding. it ain’t just europe.
/no surprise
/captn obvious
European Social conservatives should ally with Muslims on two issues: Abortion and Marriage, but apart from that they shouldn’t tolerate Islamist policies that cause terrorism.
The alliance is based on "submission". Socialists want people to submit their liberty to government, while islam demands their believers submit their liberty to a pedophile profit.