Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

23 Conservative Leaders Warn Boehner Not to Punish GOP Dissenters
The Daily Signal ^ | January 7, 2015 | Rob Bluey

Posted on 01/10/2015 8:12:18 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A coalition of 23 leaders in the conservative movement today urged Speaker John Boehner not to punish Republicans who voted against him for the House’s top job.

Boehner, who removed two of those dissenters from the powerful Rules Committee after the speaker vote, is now rethinking the decision, according to Politico. A total of 25 Republicans did not vote for Boehner.

>>>> The 25 Republicans Who Did Not Vote for John Boehner

“It is unacceptable and disappointing to see that some conservatives are already being punished by you and your leadership team for disagreements over policy and the direction of the conference. This must end immediately,” the 23 conservatives wrote in a letter from the Conservative Action Project.

Reps. Daniel Webster and Richard Nugent, two Florida Republicans who opposed Boehner, lost their seats on the Rules Committee. Rep. Randy Weber, R-Texas, said he was being punished for voting for another candidate.

“I’ve already lost the authorship of one bill,” Weber said. “Look it shouldn’t be that way.”

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, who received three votes for speaker, called Boehner a “sore winner” for seeking retribution.

Some of Boehner’s allies want the speaker to take a tough stand after surviving the most divisive speaker election since 1860. That could spell trouble for Reps. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., and Mark Meadows, R-N.C., two subcommittee chairmen.

“We need to get to the bottom of the guys who voted against [procedural motions], and we need to understand why they voted against that, and then we need to know why people voted against the speaker yesterday,” Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., told Politico.

Nunes is reportedly drafting a resolution prohibiting members who vote against the speaker from chairing a subcommittee.

Boehner, however, signaled the punishment might only be temporary.

“We’re going to have a family conversation,” Boehner said at a Wednesday press conference. “Which we had this morning about bringing our team together. And I expect that those conversations over the next couple of days will continue.”

Last week, Boehner’s spokesman told The Daily Caller, “Boehner has said publicly that there will be no retribution for ‘no’ votes.”

Conservatives want Boehner to keep that promise.

“It is incumbent upon you, as the leader of Republicans in the House, to provide unifying and inclusive leadership,” they wrote.

The letter was signed by the following 23 leaders:

  1. Edwin Meese III, former attorney general for President Ronald Reagan
  2. David McIntosh, former member of Congress from Indiana
  3. Becky Norton Dunlop, former White House adviser to President Ronald Reagan
  4. L. Brent Bozell III, chairman of ForAmerica
  5. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council
  6. Ken Cuccinelli, president of the Senate Conservatives Fund
  7. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony List
  8. Colin A. Hanna, president of Let Freedom Ring
  9. Matt Kibbe, president of FreedomWorks
  10. David N. Bossie, president of Citizens United
  11. Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of Tea Party Patriots
  12. Tim Wildmon, president of American Family Association
  13. William L. Walton, vice president, Council for National Policy
  14. William G. “Jerry” Boykin, retired U.S. Army general and executive VP, Family Research Council
  15. J. Kenneth Blackwell, chairman, Constitutional Congress
  16. T. Kenneth Cribb Jr., former domestic adviser, President Ronald Reagan
  17. Alfred S. Regnery, chairman, Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund
  18. Richard A. Viguerie, chairman, ConservativeHQ.com
  19. Andrew C. McCarthy, former federal prosecutor
  20. Frank J. Gaffney Jr., president and CEO, Center for Security Policy
  21. Allen Roth, president, Secure America Now
  22. Paul Caprio, director, Family PAC Federal
  23. Richard Manning, Americans for Limited Government

Two of the signers, Meese and Dunlop, are affiliated with The Heritage Foundation.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; cryingcheeto; gop; gope; johnboehner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: ConservativeMind; Jim Robinson

Which one, Jim Robinson or Jim Thompson?


21 posted on 01/10/2015 9:01:30 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
Boehner will give this serious consideration (after discussing w Nancy).

and Obama.

22 posted on 01/10/2015 9:02:27 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Bush ran against Ronald Reagan in 1980, and yet Reagan seemed magnanimous enough to pick him as his running mate.

(In full disclosure, I also heard that the CFR demanded Reagan pick Bush for his running mate, or they wouldn’t support him.)


23 posted on 01/10/2015 9:05:40 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Jim Thompson

You didn’t ping Jim Thompson.

There are rules.


24 posted on 01/10/2015 9:24:32 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

At the least, Dear Mr. Boehner, start worrying about the treacherousness of Democrats before worrying about it from Republicans. The opponents didn’t vote for Nancy; they voted for a different Republican. A sensible response would be “I hear you.”


25 posted on 01/10/2015 9:26:56 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Bush ran against Ronald Reagan in 1980, and yet Reagan seemed magnanimous enough to pick him as his running mate.

Yeah, but look at what the catastrophic consequences of having a CIA lifer in that position have been for the country! Bush (CIA DCI), Clinton (CIA asset), Bush II (CIA DCI son), Obama (who knows where his controllers are from?). (BTW, I understand that Bush Sr. had a cover career, but dig around a little.)

And who is running this year, hmm??

26 posted on 01/10/2015 9:28:32 PM PST by InMemoriam (Interest rates are hot-wired to zero to delay the complete destruction of the dollar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Reagan was not always the best policy maven in Washington, but he had a way of striving to pour oil on troubled Republican waters.


27 posted on 01/10/2015 9:29:50 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: InMemoriam

A lazy people has themselves to blame.


28 posted on 01/10/2015 9:30:46 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: InMemoriam

For such wonderful CIA representation, America sure did a lousy job of knowing anything in advance about 9/11.


29 posted on 01/10/2015 9:32:10 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

The FIRST thing they should do is make these Speaker elections by secret ballot. Its CRAZY to get slapped for your vote.


30 posted on 01/10/2015 9:59:43 PM PST by RW_Whacko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In full disclosure, I also heard that the CFR demanded Reagan pick Bush for his running mate, or they wouldn’t support him.

Mike Reagan was present when his father decided to pick Bush, and he says that story is pure baloney.

31 posted on 01/10/2015 10:09:50 PM PST by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

You’re twisting everything.

There’s no moral responsibility to accept consequences when the consequences emanate from corruption.


32 posted on 01/10/2015 10:14:42 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
who is Devin Nunes and how do we kick him out of the country?

Incredibly, he was until recently considered a conservative and even wrote a book, Restoring the Republic, published by the conservative outfit World Net Daily in 2010. Since he's apparently turning into another Charlie Crist, he will have to be "primaried" in the next election.

33 posted on 01/10/2015 10:17:27 PM PST by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Funny your example, CEO of a company. That implies private ownership and private privilege.

How did Boehner become CEO in this sense of the people’s house? It isn’t any better than the Obama he has whined about abusing his privilege (well Obama has abused his privilege, but Boehner should be trying to do more than just whine).

The classy thing for Mr. Cheeto would be to say, not just to the House rebels, but the American people at large, “I hear you and here’s how we are going to try to do things differently.” Not “You just crossed Guido! Watch out for horse heads in your beds.”


34 posted on 01/10/2015 10:19:33 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

That’s good to hear.


35 posted on 01/10/2015 10:36:04 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
“We’re going to have a family conversation,” Boehner said at a Wednesday press conference.

Gonna Make Them An Offer They Can't Refuse

36 posted on 01/10/2015 10:47:25 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

!


37 posted on 01/10/2015 11:55:49 PM PST by skinkinthegrass ("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Got a call today from NRA wanting money...

They started by asking my opinion of which was more feared:

1. Barack Obama’s amnesty actions

2. Hillary Clinton getting into the white house.

I responded by saying “Republicans in congress who will do nothing to stand up to an unconstitutional president!

If republicans cannot un-seat a sell-out traitor RINO leader like Boehner, our goose is cooked... and it doesn’t matter who is in the white house.

I then asked “What in the hell does Obama have to do to get impeached???”

Republicans can impeach Clinton for Oral-Office favors, but they cannot impeach Obama for subverting the law???

What happens to this country is not Obama’s fault... its ours... and Boehner is leading the charge into collapse while our representatives plead with him not to punish them for dissenting????

Give me a break!


38 posted on 01/11/2015 12:06:32 AM PST by Safrguns (PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A basic political principle is not to defecate in one’s own nest. Another is just because you can doesn’t mean that you should. Boehner is going to need the votes and support of the guys he’s crapping on. Yes, he can, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea.


39 posted on 01/11/2015 12:22:40 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The cryin squishy Cheeto must feel the heat.


40 posted on 01/11/2015 4:10:36 AM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson