Posted on 01/09/2015 8:49:13 AM PST by Kaslin
Yeah it is. They write the law. They execute the law. They adjudicate the law.
And you don’t vote for any of it. Sucks to be you.
LOL! I was gonna say, Shhhh. Don’t tell them that cause they have other ideas. Unless you got a berkshire-hathaway sized back account, good luck fighting them.
Had a liberal the other day complaining about breathing all the terrible CO2 pollution from all the cars.
I had a fleeting moment of thought about trying to explain that CO2 isn’t a “pollutant” but when looking into those empty eyes of hers, I thought better of it.
I was witnessing the face of total indoctrination and stupidity.
Sucks to be us.
Should have strangled him to death, shrieking "CO2 KILLS THE WORLD! STOP BREATHING!!!!"
One of the most unconstitutional things Congress has ever done was to create agencies and give them the power to make rules withe the weight of law.
The EPA was called a “rogue regulatory agency” by a federal judge. They routinely ignore the law. the Constitution, and the courts.
And the Gelded Old Party jellyfish we send to DC every 4 years in midterm elections do nothing about it, because they're scared to death of the commie media accusing them of wanting to 'shut down the government'.
” Should have strangled him to death,”
read my mind
Kneel! Kneel before your government employee masters! Bring them offerings of bribes lest they strike you down!
You could have suggested that, if he were truly that concerned about CO2 emissions, he should do his part by no longer exhaling when he breathes. You could assure him that inhaling is fine so long as he refrains from exhaling. (Side benefit: He’d have to stop talking. )
In the 70’s they began making mfr’s put catalytic converters on cars.
These converters transform car exhaust hydrocarbons into water vapor (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2)
Now they tell us CO2 is bad.
They can’t have it both ways.
Article. I.
Section. 1.
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
No, the EPA is outside the law. It has no right to exist. It is therefore against the law, and has been since its inception in 1970.
The EPA is a criminal "protection racket" that should simply be disbanded immediately, and all the moneys taxed to maintain it over the decades refunded to the individual taxpayers who paid the bill (or their estates). That refund should not come from the Treasury, which belongs to the People. It should be drawn from the private holdings of the government officials (or their estates) who approved its operations over the years, in proportion to their responsibility for those decisions or operations.
I'm not prejudiced in any way, and would insist on collecting from everyone responsible, regardless of position, in proportion to his actions in support of this criminal organization: Presidents, legislators, Supreme Court justices, agency administrators, and 501c-3 foundations. (Where 501c-3s are concerned, as private citizens, individual Board members and donors would be exempt from penalty.) All who officially supported or abetted the EPA took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and all violated it. An outfit like the CATO Institute or the Club for Growth would do an excellent job apportioning responsibility appropriately. When explaining it to liberals, we could informally term this a "redistribution of wealth." But in reality it is just returning people's property—inflation-adjusted and with interest, of course.
Since all operations of the EPA have constituted a taking under cover of law and a deprivation of Americans' Constitutional rights (with literally world-changing consequences), any immunities ordinarily granted to office-holders doing their jobs are void. It will be very merciful of us if we do not pursue criminal prosecution as well.
The Clean Air Act is unconstitutionally vague and should be repealed. And the process of "peer review" of proposed regulations cannot work when the reviewers are all clones of Jonathan Gruber.
A common misconception.
They enforce the laws as written. It's the fault of Congress, which could stop all of it today.
PATRICK HENRY, Virginia Ratifying Convention: This, sir, is my great objection to the Constitution, that there is no true responsibility — and that the preservation of our liberty depends on the single chance of men being virtuous enough to make laws to punish themselves.
I can sympathize with Henry here.
On the other hand, a Constitution that had some kind of Ombudsman built into it, would it end up being any better than our current situation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.