Common Core: Republican Minefield?

Nine months from now, Republican candidates for president will meet on the stage of the Reagan Presidential Library (with the old Air Force One providing great visuals) for the first debate of the 2016 race. It seems likely that among those in attendance will be at least four -- Chris Christie, Bobby Jindal, Mike Huckabee and Jeb Bush -- who support (or once supported) the Common Core. Republicans are about to find out what's been percolating among the grassroots. Properly undertaken, a debate about Common Core could be healthy for the party and the country. Or it could be an unholy squabble over rumors and bogeymen. We'll see.

The old joke has it that America will never adopt national education standards because Republicans hate anything with the word "national" in it, and Democrats hate anything with the word "standards" in it. Common Core's advocates accordingly worked through the National Governors Association and other state groups. Backed with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Common Core has now been adopted by 41 states. The Obama administration boosted participation by dangling waivers from some requirements of the No Child Left Behind law, as well as stimulus funds, to states that adopted Common Core. That alone was enough to alienate many Republicans.

Common Core is not a national curriculum. It doesn't prescribe how children should be taught, but does set benchmarks for what kids in K-12 should know and when. Chester E. Finn Jr., president emeritus of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, is a Reagan alumnus who mostly favors the Core. "It's superior to the standards" in 75 percent of the states, he explains. Assuming wide adoption and smooth implementation, it would solve the problem of our national mobility -- high by international standards -- unduly handicapping children. Fourth graders in Spokane would be learning the same math skills as those in Dubuque and Miami. It would also permit parents to evaluate their own schools based on uniform standards.

Conservatives like rigor and accountability. What they emphatically do not like is the leftist, anti-American propaganda that has infiltrated school curricula around the nation. At the moment, despite many claims to the contrary on the Internet, Common Core does not contain history standards, only math and English ones. Aware of the huge backlash that greeted the Clinton-era attempt to promote highly tendentious national history standards (Lynne Cheney played a starring role in exposing them), Common Core's backers have steered clear -- for now.

But as my Ethics and Public Policy Center colleague Stanley Kurtz has argued, left-wing activists are forever beavering away, shaping what young Americans learn about their past and accordingly what they believe about the present. One vector is the College Board, the company that designs and administers the Advanced Placement tests. The AP American history test is currently under revision, and none of the changes is good. As Finn and Frederick Hess wrote in National Review Online, "There's little about economics that doesn't feel caricatured or framed in terms of government efforts to combat injustice. Students are introduced to decade after decade of American racism and depravity, with little positive context for the nation's foreign engagements or its success creating shared prosperity. ... The bias is especially stark when it comes to the 20th century's iconic presidents. FDR and LBJ are treated reverently ... (whereas) Reagan is described ... as a man of 'bellicose rhetoric.'"

Kurtz notes that one of the prime movers of the Common Core program, David Coleman, has recently been named president of the College Board. "Under his leadership," Kurtz warns, "the College Board has begun to radically redesign all of its AP exams." It is, Kurtz fears, a "backdoor way to seize control of subjects that would be too hot to handle if formally labeled Common Core."

There are many reasons to favor high standards in schools and to adopt a national curriculum. The danger, of course, is the political content. At some point, Common Core may attempt to adopt objectionable history standards. That hasn't happened yet. In the meantime, the College Board is the battlefield. The changes to AP U.S. history have not been formally adopted. The College Board is open to comments. The deadline is February. Here's the link: https://advancesinap.collegeboard.org/english-history-and-social-science/us-history/feedback-form

Mona is wrong. When you look at the agenda and instructions sent to the schools under Common Core, it is in fact a national educational agenda, which makes no sense and does not educate. In fact, it turns education on its head. Black is white, up is down, etc.

Every Dictatorial leader throughout time has supported something akin to a “Common Core” education knowing full well that once you capture the minds of the young and very young your situation is secure for generations. Our Marxists are no different.

There is NOTHING good about Common Core and this writer is either misinformed or lying.

Not only does Common Core dictate ciriculum standards, it also mandates state databases on children to which the Federal Government can have access for its own nefarious purposes.

This has been coming on for a long time, ever since the Federal govt. got involved in education. More and more money has been thrown at schools and teaching, and the end product has been deteriorating and has deteriorated, substantially.

Here, in Yakima, the voters approved a 250,000 dollar bond to rebuild a perfectly substantial building that had been allowed to deteriorate with a glass-encased architect's monstrosity. At the same time there is a 44% drop-out rate and many of those that do graduate have to take remedial classes in college to progress to the basic college requirements.

When you look at the agenda and instructions sent to the schools under Common Core, it is in fact a national educational agenda, which makes no sense and does not educate. In fact, it turns education on its head. Black is white, up is down, etc.
**************

Worse than a national educational agenda, common core is a globalist agenda. Why did common core meed in Dubai?

Islam is being taught in US schools through common core.
Allah in our schools ( Common Core )
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3241438/posts

See list of recent reports of Islam in schools here MA, MS, MD, TN, CA, etc.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3227490/posts?page=19#19

Why Did Hundreds of Common Core Implementers Meet in Dubai?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3222449/posts
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/why-did-hundreds-common-core-implementers-meet-in-dubai/

The big secret = Common Core is the indoctrination of Global Marxism!!!!

Common Core Not State Led – Here’s Proof
http://www.redstate.com/diary/littletboca/2014/10/24/common-core-state-led-heres-proof/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.