Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Spent $65 Mil to Help Afghan Women Escape Repression, No Clue if it Helped
Judicial Watch ^ | January 5, 2015

Posted on 01/05/2015 12:17:19 PM PST by jazusamo

In the latest of many scandals involving U.S. aid for Afghan social issues, tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars have been wasted on programs to supposedly assist women in the Islamic country escape repression yet we have no idea if it’s made a difference because there’s no accountability or follow up.

During a two-year period from 2011 to 2013 the U.S. blew $64.8 million on 652 projects, programs and initiatives to support Afghan women though details of how the money was spent and the effectiveness of the costly experiments aren’t available, according to a federal audit. The cash flowed through three agencies—the departments of Defense and State and the famously corrupt U.S. Agency for international Development (USAID)—and it marked the latest of many allocations for the same cause. In fact, the audit, conducted by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), discloses that the agencies spent an “additional $850.5 million on 17 projects, but couldn’t identify the specific amount of funds within the projects that directly supported Afghan women.”

It’s as if Uncle Sam is conducting massive cash giveaways without having to answer to anyone. The watchdog even spells this out in its report. “This lack of accountability is primarily due to the fact that none of the three agencies has effective mechanisms for tracking the funding associated with these projects,” the SIGAR report says. Additionally, investigators found that agency responsibility for projects and programs to benefit Afghan women was fragmented. “As a result, no single DOD or State office was able to readily identify the full extent of their department’s efforts to support Afghan women,” the report says. This could lead to “inaccurate reporting of the agencies’ efforts,” it further points out.

That’s putting it very diplomatically. If American taxpayers are doling out millions of dollars, they certainly deserve to know how the money is being spent. In this particular case the U.S. government justified allocating huge sums of money to help women and girls recover from Taliban rule that denied them access to education, employment and healthcare and subjected them to extreme violence if they violated the rules. Improving the lives of Afghan women and girls has been a priority for the United States since late 2001 and in fact, Congress passed the Afghan Women and Relief Act authorizing the president to provide educational and healthcare assistance for women and children living in Afghanistan and as refugees in neighboring countries. In 2012 the U.S. Embassy in Kabul created the U.S. Embassy Kabul Gender Strategy to address the needs of Afghan women in mission policies and programming.

It’s a noble cause that’s received an astounding $627 million from Congress, the report reveals, but the fact remains that no one knows how the money is being spent or if it has made a difference. That’s downright insane and, of course, enraging for the hard-working citizens of this country that provide the cash. SIGAR recommends that the government agencies that have gone on a spending spree involving Afghan women’s causes develop and implement mechanisms to track the number and funding of projects, programs and initiatives. This may seem like common sense to most, not something that an audit must suggest.

Fraud and corruption are rampant in the U.S. government’s Afghan reconstruction programs and Judicial Watch has been reporting it for years. Just a few weeks ago JW wrote about another scandal-plagued initiative involving the State Department blowing $18.5 million to renovate a prison in Afghanistan that remains unfinished and unused years after the U.S.-funded work began. It turns out that the State Department officer overseeing the multi-million-dollar boondoggle was convicted for accepting bribes from an agency contractor.

Last fall Judicial Watch reported that, despite multiple warnings of fraud and corruption inside the Afghan Ministry of Public Health, the U.S. keeps sending hundreds of millions of dollars to support the Islamic republic’s scandal-plagued healthcare system. Months earlier JW also reported that the U.S. Army refuses to suspend Afghanistan reconstruction contracts with dozens of companies tied to Al Qaeda and the Taliban out of fear that it would violate their “due process rights.” The deals are part of the United States’ whopping $89.5 billion Afghanistan reconstruction effort.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; corruption; dod; inspectorgeneral; jw; sigar; statedepartment; usaid
Little doubt this $65 million is the tip of the iceberg and many of these millions are probably in Hamid Karzai and families bank accounts.
1 posted on 01/05/2015 12:17:19 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Or Democrat bank accounts.


2 posted on 01/05/2015 12:30:48 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

” and many of these millions are probably in Hamid Karzai and families bank accounts. “

” and ALL of these millions are in Hamid Karzai and families bank accounts.”

Fixed it.


3 posted on 01/05/2015 12:42:51 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
What does he mean "No Clue"?
I could give him one.

4 posted on 01/05/2015 12:43:19 PM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

:-) Exactly.


5 posted on 01/05/2015 12:45:54 PM PST by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We went into Afghanistan with surprisingly few casualties during the first year. We could have given them any constitution and we chose to give them one that stated that Sharia law is the highest authority in the land. We told them how much we admired Islam. We forbid our soldiers from sharing their Christian faith.

And now women are still property there and we are not even respected. We refuse to project our own culture.


6 posted on 01/05/2015 12:46:04 PM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

7 posted on 01/05/2015 12:51:09 PM PST by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Probably mostly to promote abortion is my guess.


8 posted on 01/05/2015 12:54:51 PM PST by Lorianne (fed pork, bailouts, gone taxmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The fraud and corruption was on the part of the Afghans. Credulity and naiveté on the part of the Americans.

Paying Afghan contractors U.S. prices. 2LT’s approving the construction of buildings (Infantry 2LT, not Engineer). Commanders inflating the cost of a project to generate a bullet on their OER. Get it done before end of tour or do not try mentality. So what if the next unit has to demo your pet project, you have your good OER.

Afghan cement was 50% dirt. This can actually work in some applications, but not slabs and beams. Re-bar laid on the ground and 6 in of concrete poured over it. Cheap Pak plywood in construction. Driving nails in the grove and not on the ridge on a tin roof. About half the nails that were specified in a frame structure.

9 posted on 01/05/2015 12:59:31 PM PST by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“assist women in the Islamic country escape repression “

OK, I am a little confused, someone please help. The Smartest woman in the world, Mrs Clinton and our President and Secretary of State ALL carry on about what a great Religion Islam is. In Islam Women are PROPERTY and have No Legal Rights, so how could they be suffering from repression if they have No Such Right in the first place??


10 posted on 01/05/2015 1:04:02 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I guess American politicians ran out of ways to f&^% up taxpayer dollars so they came up with THIS scam!


11 posted on 01/05/2015 1:10:14 PM PST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Great response and beat me to it.

ISLAM is the problem. The only way to ‘escape repression’ is to leave Islamic countries. Unfortunately, they bring their moon god woman-hating cult with them...


12 posted on 01/05/2015 1:42:59 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What do you want to bet that “Gruber style” accounting rules were in effect in the spending of these tax dollars.


13 posted on 01/05/2015 1:43:41 PM PST by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The other thing it helped was to bolster the feelings of moral superiority of those that supported this policy.

Whether it actually had any effect at all was of no consequence compared to that.


14 posted on 01/05/2015 1:45:30 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

You’re not confused, you’re dead on the mark. For every cra*phole country living under sharia law women/girls will have no rights.

These sham aid programs are nothing more than corrupt programs paying off the corrupt on both sides at the expense of U.S. taxpayers.


15 posted on 01/05/2015 1:52:26 PM PST by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s as if Uncle Sam is conducting massive cash giveaways without having to answer to anyone.

***
I am sure all of us are shocked.


16 posted on 01/05/2015 3:35:55 PM PST by Bigg Red (Congress, do your duty and repo his pen and his phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson