Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2015 8:32:32 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Squawk 8888

Canada


2 posted on 01/02/2015 8:32:52 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Good post, thank you.


3 posted on 01/02/2015 9:06:06 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

>> Canadian companies should be putting strategic plans in place that prevent them from capitalizing on opportunities.

... said no CEO, ever.

That must be a mistake.


5 posted on 01/02/2015 10:25:56 AM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed is his demon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

8 posted on 01/02/2015 12:57:30 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

So at what point is every crude holding tank, tanker and pipeline 100% full(assuming there is still pumping going on and this isn’t a demand issue).


9 posted on 01/02/2015 1:06:17 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I keep looking for a pony under the pile of crap. I don’t see a return to the heady days of the last two years in Shale anytime soon. I got my first victim resume on Friday. There will be a lot more of them and mostly from the shale business. I’m very afraid that the almost never ending shortage of engineers and such is going to become a true glut.

I forgot who was on Bloomberg but he gave a pretty rational evaluation of shale... projects, not oil fields. His group has never invested in shale. He understands the decline rates and the economic model of shale. Few others seem to. Shale now is like a 35 day trip in a lifeboat with 30 days of water. If the well does not pay out in the first 6 months to a year it never will... there just isn’t enough production left after that to make a decent rate of return.... The best wells are able to payout in that time all the way down to about $50 but the mean well is not... the quality of the mean well all depends on where you are in the area.... sweet spot or not.

Anyway. Without the shale bump global decline at “normal” drilling rates is about what, 2 to 3% a year? Shouldn’t take long to work off a mere 1% surplus so often referred to as a GLUT... how foolish that seems to me. 1% excess supply is so easy to remedy. We don’t need 100 plus oil, we need steady 80 or so in real dollar terms. When the Saudis said the target was 90 I felt pretty good about that. Thinking it might be a healthy blend for economies and production.

There was no more reason for 100+ the last three years than there is for 50 now. Oil has been too high and it has made me about as uncomfortable as the low price does now because I knew it would discourage demand and hurt the economy. It did both. The largest industry in the world allows themselves to b price takers and constantly pilloried by a bunch of snot nosed traders.

Oh for the days of the Texas Railroad Commission and allowables. We had a pretty good oilfield in those days. Steady, quiet, reliable, good prices to the consumer, predictable. We have lived on a roller coaster in so many areas of the economy for so long. It seems like things were more stable a few decades ago before the 70s.


11 posted on 01/04/2015 8:49:00 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Adversity does not build character so much as expose it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson