Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skinkinthegrass

The author of this article is wrong. The judge is entitled to raise and address any issue that he believes is necessary for him to address in the course of issuing a decision. He gave the parties notice and the opportunity to submit briefing. He did what he was required to. What happened was unusual; it was definitely not “rogue.”


9 posted on 12/24/2014 4:57:49 PM PST by TheConservator ("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: TheConservator
thanks, for the clarification.

13 posted on 12/24/2014 7:04:15 PM PST by skinkinthegrass ("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'MBuccConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson