Honestly. Why is this twit's views even being critiqued? I have some stupid southern Democrat moron relatives. Can I write an article pretending that they have a valid assertion that needs refuting, too?
Salon is probably read by less than .0001% of people. By writing outrageous articles and getting mentioned elsewhere in publications that more people read, they hope they attract readers to their site to increase their “hits”. MSNBC does the same thing
I would agree out of sheer tiredness, but I know we both know the utter tripe being fed to people, including students whose parents are paying for it, and the ubiquity of its acceptance these days. Even this must be refuted these days, it’s amazing what’s just being accepted first on the campuses and then in the broader media. Acceptance of absolutely retarded concepts like “white privilege” gained traction this way.
Sounds like she has serious issues of her own, PhD or not, if she’s writing disturbing things like this.
I can’t wait for Valerie’s treatise on Muhammad’s pedophilia.
Oh wait.................
I care little about the good doctor's opinion, but this bit is concerning.
How do these people always wind up in a position where they can influence the young?