Posted on 12/23/2014 7:57:14 AM PST by Academiadotorg
I knew she had to be a fox!
Don’t over-analyze it, the comparison was apt within its parameters :)
Thanks Scott, I needed that!
Wonder what she would think if some conservative student with a subversive turn of mind were to throw a bucket of red paint (=blood) on her office door to represent the 100,000,000 + people killed in the name of the bloody ideology she embraces?
ok
I hope you know that was a compliment :)
The Three Pillars of Propaganda (media, academia and the DNC) have promoted Marxism for decades.
Pray America is waking
Yes. And I thank you.
I bet she fondly recalls Russians standing in line for hours for a roll of toilet paper.
So smart but so dumb. She needs a man, some pots and pans, and a cookbook to learn her proper place.
THIS is why I despise liberals. They want everything obscured and fuzzy, nothing true, nothing clear or right, just mumbo-jumbo they can interpret any way they want to make themselves feel good about themselves.
Truth is unambiguous. Righteousness is unambiguous. Honesty and forthrightness not fuzzy terms. Only evil people love ambiguity.
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. --John 3:19
what’s Ann Coulter’s line: “Liberals always think you’re doing what they are guilty of.”
My guess would be that she is a man-hater, too.
]quote]She insists in the article that a “series of studies has found that political conservatives tend toward certain psychological characteristics,” such as “Dogmatism, rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity; a need to avoid uncertainty; support for authoritarianism; a heightened sense of threat from others; and a personal need for structure.” [end quote]
This is from the early 1950s and was an attempt to link fascism/nazism to cognitive and mental ills. It is often trotted-out by communists as support for their hatred of normal conservative people. The research doesn’t meet standards of scientific objectivity or theoretical integrity. It was research designed to give legitimacy to communist and hard left ideology. Adorno and Frenkel-Brunswik were early figures in this. A good critique of this was made in the late-80s by JJ Ray but the bottom line is it is unsound in theory and in study.
The grading system in a university might be considered dogmatic. Wonder if she is okay with eliminating all grading standards at her university or the class that she is teaching. Also, how about if she is not considered an authority in her class but an equal.
Faculty lounge marxists - is there anything more useless? As one of their own, Sartre said - “hell is other people.” Just imagine what it is like to possess a head full of such staleness and bitterness and have to defend it.
Hmmm...I wonder if she’s ever done any spots for Fantastic Sam’s...
Is it me, or is there a lizard underneath the lose skin?
Screaming at or about something.. yes.. I know EXACTLY what you mean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.