Posted on 12/12/2014 6:49:32 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
As some lawmakers purport to be stunned over the new CIA torture report the fact is Congress knew for years that enhanced interrogation techniques were being used on terrorists and in fact dozens of members were repeatedly briefed on the subject, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Back in 2010 Judicial Watch obtained government documentsonce marked Top Secretthat reveal between 2001 and 2007, the CIA briefed at least 68 members of Congress on its interrogation program. This included so-called enhanced interrogation techniques. The dates of all congressional briefings and, in some cases, the members of Congress in attendance as well as the specific subjects discussed are included in the files. Pelosi, who has publicly denied she was briefed by the CIA on the use of these techniques, is specifically referenced in a briefing that took place on April 24, 2002, regarding the ongoing interrogations of Abu Zubaydah.
After being the subject of enhanced interrogation techniques, Zubaydah identified Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) as the mastermind of the September 11 terrorist attacks that killed thousands of innocent Americans. Before Zubaydah identified KSM, currently held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay Cuba, the 9/11 mastermind didnt even appear in the intelligence communitys file of key Al Qaeda operatives or associates. KSM, in turn, provided valuable intel about another Al Qaeda jihadist, Majid Khan, who, in turn, identified a terrorist named Zubair who was subsequently captured. Zubair later provided information that led to the arrest of Al Qaedas South Asia leader.
These jihadists didnt exactly provide this valuable information willingly over tea and biscuits. The CIA held meetings with legislators as it pursued broader authority for its interrogation program, which did not begin until the agency got legal guidance from the Department of Justice (DOJ). A separate CIA report obtained by JW details the effectiveness of enhanced interrogation techniques to thwart Al Qaeda operations in the United States and overseas. Nevertheless, President Obama banned the use of enhanced interrogation techniques during his first week in office in January 2009 and withheld information detailing the programs successes. His allies in Congress did an about-face, pretending to be shocked and in the dark about the interrogation program they had been briefed aboutand apparently endorsedso many times.
When Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein proudly released the torture report this week, she said the document examines the CIAs secret overseas detention of at least 119 individuals and the use of coercive interrogation techniquesin some cases amounting to torture. The veteran California senator also proclaimed that the enhanced interrogation techniques, which she compares to those used by torturous regimes during the Cold War, were not effective and that the CIA provided extensive inaccurate information about the program to policymakers. Furthermore, the CIA program was far more brutal than the agency represented to Congress, according to Feinstein.
CIA Director John Brennan defends the interrogation techniques and assures the agency obtained useful information as a result of the program, including intelligence that led to the death of Osama bin Laden. Interrogations of detainees produced intelligence that helped thwart attack plans, capture terrorists and save lives, according to a statement issued by the CIA this week. The intelligence gained from the program was critical to our understanding of al-Qaida and continues to inform our counterterrorism efforts to this day, the statement says, adding that the reports characterization of how the CIA briefed Congress on the program is inaccurate. While we made mistakes, the record does not support the Studys inference that the Agency systematically and intentionally misled each of these audiences on the effectiveness of the program. Moreover, the process undertaken by the Committee when investigating the program provided an incomplete and selective picture of what occurred.
Clap: Clap: Emoticon!
How come aborting the innocent isn’t torture but EVERYTHING is when dealing with an enemy of America, a terrorist?
Congress is complicit. Impeach every last one of the basturds
>> How come aborting the innocent isnt torture...
Does anyone truly believe the Left wouldn’t (and does not) “torture”?
Save
I have a modest proposal for the treatment and interrogation of terrorist unlawful combatants captured in acts of terror .
Enact a policy that the degree of physical or mental force or violence they are subject to should not exceed the levels of physical and mental torture they, the terrorists, imposed on their victims.
This will completely gut any so called claims of torture on our behalf.
After as much information has been extracted from them, they should be tried before a military tribunal and hung if found guilty.
NAMES!
We want the names of ALL of the people in Congress who were briefed, INCLUDING staffers!
These Democrats were hoping to divert attention from Obama and to nail Bush & Cheney. Let's see what their reactions are to THEIR names on a "UN Civil Rights Abuse" prosecution!
Eric Holder says that International Law trumps the Constitution. Let's see if he changes his tune when ALL of the Democrat Congressmen & staff who were briefed are indicted by the UN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.