Exactly how would this work? If a gun isn’t “registered” exactly how would Nevada know that a purchase even occurred?
Well that’s the next step, isn’t it?
And each sale with be a de facto registration.
According to the wording in the initiative, ALL gun sales are/will be required to pass through an FFL. If caught outside the guidelines, the first offense would be a misdemeanor and if you get caught a 2nd time it would be a felony. It would also make the FFL’s use NICS instead of the state system currently used. (I think I got that right!) Anyway, if you and a buddy are out in the desert doing some plinking, it would also be against the newly worded NRS for you to allow him/her to use your firearm. Sacntioned licensed ranges would be okay if I read it right. If your neighbor comes over you can show him your new weapon but you can’t let him touch it. Defining everything will be an onerous task as they are finding out in WA since the no/low info voters passed I-594. Of course it’s all to close the “gun show loophole” and to prevent domestic abuser from obtaining a firearm. No restrictions on bats or knives or fists or broken bottles etc., etc., etc. Yeah, that’ll work out just fine.