Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: RoosterRedux
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving group of professionals.
To: RoosterRedux
Can we just program the freakin’ robots to hunt down lawyers?
To: RoosterRedux
The first thing they'd do is find loopholes in Asimov’s three rules.
5 posted on
12/06/2014 5:27:59 PM PST by
CrazyIvan
(I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
To: RoosterRedux
Robots Could Replace Most Lawyers Robots or a gang of vicious cut-throat highwaymen.
6 posted on
12/06/2014 5:29:19 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(D.H.S. has the same headcount as the US Marine Corps with twice the budget)
To: RoosterRedux
Can’t happen. Robots are too honest and would apply the law fairly. Lawyers don’t.
7 posted on
12/06/2014 5:31:46 PM PST by
Crazy ole coot
(Mr. obama, Sen Cruz and Sen. Rubio are NOT Natural Born Citizens.)
To: RoosterRedux
Oh wait, they’re not already vile evil mind-numbed robots?
Who knew?
10 posted on
12/06/2014 5:35:09 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(GOP. GOPe. GOPeGads! GOPeWWWWWWWWWWWWW...)
To: RoosterRedux
oh well, it was a good scam while it lasted?
11 posted on
12/06/2014 5:40:13 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..) c)
To: RoosterRedux
The epidimy of robot takeover of the legal profession will be drones.
The drones will be forever on patrol monitoring EMT channels. They will immediately be diverted to an auto wreck to begin photographing and will chase the ambulance to the Emergency room.
Emergency rooms will need to establish an air traffic control robot controller to handle all the ambulance chasing robot drones.
12 posted on
12/06/2014 5:41:27 PM PST by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: RoosterRedux
Maybe the lawyers could go seek work as...
roofers
truck-drivers
dry-wall specialists
taxi-drivers
farm laborers
restaurant staff
plumbers
Oh, wait, now we have Mexicans and even more recently, Central American KIDS for all those.
Never mind.
13 posted on
12/06/2014 5:44:23 PM PST by
gaijin
To: RoosterRedux
Mind numb robots for congress. Cool!
14 posted on
12/06/2014 5:48:40 PM PST by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
To: RoosterRedux; GeronL; Slings and Arrows; null and void; Daffynition
About time the robots started reading Shakespeare.
15 posted on
12/06/2014 5:49:09 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: RoosterRedux
16 posted on
12/06/2014 5:50:10 PM PST by
rbg81
To: Bender2
Hey Bender do you want be lawyer
17 posted on
12/06/2014 5:55:05 PM PST by
SevenofNine
(We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
To: RoosterRedux
What’s the difference between a dead possum in the road and a dead lawyer in the road? You see skid marks in front of the possum.
CC
To: RoosterRedux
Who programs the robot lawyers?
20 posted on
12/06/2014 5:56:23 PM PST by
right way right
(America has embraced the suck of Freedumb.)
To: RoosterRedux
If the trend continued by the Great Pretender and Holder of outcomes based on identity and status rather than evidence continues it’s a distinct possibility. It worked for the Great Pretender in the eligibility cases. When your status enables you to replace the rule of law with the rule of ridicule the rule of law is gone.
23 posted on
12/06/2014 6:06:11 PM PST by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: RoosterRedux
Hmm ... they’re talking about the robots replacing associate attorneys but not paralegals. Wonder what that means ;-)
24 posted on
12/06/2014 6:10:42 PM PST by
Fast Moving Angel
(It is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.)
To: RoosterRedux
Well the public screwls don’t teach Shakespeare anymore ( or the Bible, or even the Book of Mormon — all of which had a few words to say about lawyers. Ha!) - so lawyers are now unnecessary I guess We’ll just let your robot and my robot duke it out in the back alley. Probably will achieve more Justice anyway
25 posted on
12/06/2014 6:11:38 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..) c)
To: RoosterRedux
“Robots Could Replace Most Lawyers”
Why would you want to kill a bunch of robots?
27 posted on
12/06/2014 6:32:39 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: RoosterRedux
Asimov:
1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2) A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Robot Lawyer would be a problem starting at Law #1.
28 posted on
12/06/2014 6:35:22 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson