[JRandomFreeper]

that my 6 year-old son's life is less important than your right to own whatever firearm and ammunition you want, then say that.

False choice.

This liberal bozo needs to shut up and read the Constitution.

/johnny

[Mechanicos]

The shooting was not the result of guns it was the result of gun control: specifically the gun-free zone policy that disarmed the victims and presented an easy target for a killer.

[Gaffer]

He is more predisposed to an irrational fear for his 6 year old son’s life than he is in being free. It’s a canard all liberals use - the children. It is the cause of some of they most egregious thefts of personal freedom affirmed to us by the Constitution.

Frankly, as a former vet myself, he can take his Navy arms instructor stuff and stick it up his ass.

[VeniVidiVici]

If you feel, like the fringe gun lobby does, that my 6 year-old son's life is less important than your right to own whatever firearm and ammunition you want,

Ok. My right to own a firearm and ammunition is more important to me than your son's life.

Now, did that statement change anything? No, because you think since you have personified guns that all guns are after your son and thus all people that own guns are bad.

[rogator]

I could make the same argument for lawn mowers, bicycles, or baseball bats.

[gnarledmaw]

Its not a false choice really. Quite factually, his 6 year olds life has no value when measured against the thousands (or millions?) of childrens lives that are snuffed out when governments become violently oppressive and those are the times our weapons are for.

[cycjec]

dismaying but not without too many parallels elsewhere.
I value his son’s life ... that’s why I am against
unconstitutional infringements of the RKBA.