Keith Ellison: No mandate for GOP; electorate ‘has a lot of complicated things that it thinks’

washingtontimes.com ^ | November 18, 2014 | David Sherfinski

[DJ MacWoW]

Statement of November 1981

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[Know et al]

Yet, if a democrat wins by 2 or 3 percentage points, he or she has a mandate.

Ok, got./s

[skinkinthegrass]

IMHO...words from an stinking (soon-to-be-Islamic-Terrorist)
moderate Muslim, operating in Congress..not valid.

[all the best]

Could somebody tell me where “mandate” appears in the Constitution? Am too lazy to search for it and figure somebody might know. Not there? Hmmm.
It’s not about mandate but who has the votes in the House and Senate.

[Westbrook]

This from a MoHamHead Muzzloid is-SLIME-ist.

The muzzloids are fomenting a backlash that will send them reeling.

[gov_bean_ counter]

The Muzzie sounds worried...

[ozzymandus]

Thanks again, Minnesota.

[dsrtsage]

If the senate had been 51 dem, and the house 50.1 dem, I am sure Ellison would be crowing about the clear unambiguous mandate for emperor narcissus to do whatever he wants

[TBP]

Ellison is a racist, America-hating Muslim who should be in Gitmo.

[Baladas]

nope, Keefer, if you don’t vote it doesn’t mean that you want the status quo. Puh-leeze, tell it to Allah.

[boop]

Oooh, may I please steal that James Watt quote for my tagline?

[DJ MacWoW]

Absolutely!

[boop]

Thank you!

[DJ MacWoW]

You’re very welcome. It’s a keeper! :-)

[tenger]

Happy to say I voted against Ellison because I just moved to his district from MD-6 (where Dan Bongino just ran). Same day registration. Seeing so much blue here is depressing.