That ended up being false.
So Jack the Ripper is still at large?! Momma, lock up your street tarts!
Did this rebuttal establilsh that the DNA excluded Kosminsky as the ripper or just establised that DNA failed to prove that he was the Ripper, thus leaving him as merely a suspect?
Please enlighten. I read that article and it seemed pretty definitive. Was it a hoax?
Thanks
I guess you are right. http://usvsth3m.com/post/96977532433/are-you-jack-the-ripper-no-and-neithers-aaron