A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that a plurality (47%) of Likely U.S. Voters thinks implementation of Obamacare should be put on hold until all legal challenges are exhausted. Forty percent (40%) disagree, but 13% are not sure...."
Nov. 19, 2014: The Vindication of John Roberts "....In NFIB v. Sebelius, that meant that if it walks like a tax and quacks like a tax, its a tax. And for the upcoming arguing of King v. Burwell, it means that an exchange established under Section 1321 of the Affordable Care Act is not an exchange established under Section 1311. It means that a Gruberesque writing of legislation in a tortured way to make a tax or any other legislative element appear to be, and to be scored by the CBO as, something different from what it actually is will not get far in the Supreme Court, or at least not with John Roberts.
Presumably, then, the odds are good that the chief justice will not be amused when the government argues, in King v. Burwell, that an exchange created under Section 1321 of the ACA Care Act is an exchange created under Section 1311.
On the other hand, this writer will be greatly amused as he savors the delicious irony (and watches liberal heads explode in the White House and on MSNBC) as the very logic that was instrumental in saving the individual mandate in NFIB v. Sebelius leads, ultimately, in King v. Burwell, to the collapse of the entire ACA.
In the meantime, those who castigated John Roberts for his opinion calling the individual mandate a tax, an opinion that the architect of the ACA has now confirmed, might want to consider an apology, along with a heaping helping of crow."
“Make it so.” It’s the Obama Way!
That’s what kids do.. tantrums etc and liberals are folks that never learn, never understand, don’t get logic or common sense or grow up hence their incompetent mindset.
.
This was a line of questioning in the hearing today.
Subcommittee on Oversight Hearing - The Role of the White House Chief Technology Officer in the HealthCare.gov Website Debacle