Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/19/2014 1:53:59 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Voters Favor Putting Health Care Law On Hold Until Court Challenges End "..... The U.S. Supreme Court has chosen to hear another legal challenge to the new national health care law, and nearly half of voters think it might be a good idea to put the brakes on Obamacare until all the court cases opposing it are through.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that a plurality (47%) of Likely U.S. Voters thinks implementation of Obamacare should be put on hold until all legal challenges are exhausted. Forty percent (40%) disagree, but 13% are not sure...."

Nov. 19, 2014: The Vindication of John Roberts "....In NFIB v. Sebelius, that meant that if it walks like a tax and quacks like a tax, it’s a tax. And for the upcoming arguing of King v. Burwell, it means that “an exchange established under Section 1321” of the Affordable Care Act is not “an exchange established under Section 1311.” It means that a “Gruberesque” writing of legislation “in a tortured way” to make a tax or any other legislative element appear to be, and to be scored by the CBO as, something different from what it actually is will not get far in the Supreme Court, or at least not with John Roberts.

Presumably, then, the odds are good that the chief justice will not be amused when the government argues, in King v. Burwell, that an exchange created under Section 1321 of the ACA Care Act is an exchange created under Section 1311.

On the other hand, this writer will be greatly amused as he savors the delicious irony (and watches liberal heads explode in the White House and on MSNBC) as the very logic that was instrumental in saving the individual mandate in NFIB v. Sebelius leads, ultimately, in King v. Burwell, to the collapse of the entire ACA.

In the meantime, those who castigated John Roberts for his opinion calling the individual mandate a tax, an opinion that the “architect” of the ACA has now confirmed, might want to consider an apology, along with a heaping helping of crow."

2 posted on 11/19/2014 2:06:53 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“Make it so.” It’s the Obama Way!


3 posted on 11/19/2014 2:10:34 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

That’s what kids do.. tantrums etc and liberals are folks that never learn, never understand, don’t get logic or common sense or grow up hence their incompetent mindset.


4 posted on 11/19/2014 2:15:37 AM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

.


5 posted on 11/19/2014 3:09:08 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This was a line of questioning in the hearing today.

Subcommittee on Oversight Hearing - The Role of the White House Chief Technology Officer in the HealthCare.gov Website Debacle

http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-oversight-hearing-role-white-house-chief-technology-officer-healthcaregov


6 posted on 11/19/2014 8:12:38 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson