Posted on 11/13/2014 2:06:46 PM PST by 11th_VA
We have a spineless Boehner as a leader. He was once the lead singer of the rock group “Limp Lizard”. Yes he was!
I don’t see how Congress can issue their own orders without the process of bill creation.
Don’t replace executive lawlessness with Congressional lawlessness.
I really think that the Republicans can set a trap here... and collapse the whole house of cards that is the 0bama Dictatorship. If they do such in the proper fashion we will see many from within this corrupt administration incarcerated.
Throw 0bola out of office? NOT GOOD ENOUGH. I want to see Holder, Hillary, Jarrett, Holly Paz and Lois Lerner (for starts) in JAIL.
Minimally, I want to see Barry Soetoro’s FBI file published and see him deported to Indonesia or Kenya or wherever it is that he came from.
GOP needs to play 'small ball' for the rest of the time Obama is in office.
Very shortly you will hear DAILY calls from the RATS on why they need 'COMPREHENSIVE' bills. They do not want to have to veto everything. At some point, the public will figure out who the REAL Party of 'NO' is ...
The underlying assumption of this article is that the president does not ‘own’ the laws passed by Congress; he simply executes them. Those laws are still ‘owned’ by Congress, and can revoke actions that do not properly execute ‘their’ laws.
I find it very hard to believe that the Constitution intended a president’s execution authority to include picking and choosing parts and pieces of laws to be executed at the president’s whim. If that were true then laws might as well not even be passed, because selective enforcement or lack of enforcement would allow the construction of an entirely different law than the one actually passed.
It is inconceivable to me that the Founders meant such a definition when they envisioned the president as ‘chief executive’.
Right? Wondering why republicans have not mentioned revocation of E orders?
Yes, you are right. He seems to stupidly be drawing another fake red line. He is really good at boxing himself into corners of his own making due to his punk attitude and immaturity.
The part that you are missing is “not constitutionally based.”
The President has unlimited Constitutional power to pardon.
Obviously this is how 0bama can abuse the system. I don’t like it anymore than you do, but pretending that Congress can override a pardon is a fool’s errand.
Throw 0bola out of office? NOT GOOD ENOUGH. I want to see Holder, Hillary, Jarrett, Holly Paz and Lois Lerner (for starts) in JAIL.
Minimally, I want to see Barry Soetoro’s FBI file published and see him deported to Indonesia or Kenya or wherever it is that he came from
___________________________________________________________-
I want to see the exact same things as you do. Wouldn’t that just be the best to see all these super arrogant crooks go to jail?!
It would be if we had leaders that loved the United States.
Boehner and McConnell's primary focus is trying to find a way to seemingly oppose Obama all the while granting full amnesty for what will be over 40 million third world anti-American, anti-English future RAT voters.
We are truly about to witness the final irreversible destruction of the United States as Founded.
I am not giving up. I am seeing the cold hard reality we face.
With the indirect help of McConnell and Boehner he will somehow grant Amnesty to what will be at least 40 million third worlders (over 5 years)
we are about to witness the checkmate of our Republic as Founded.
In the case, Clinton issues an EO that said:
"contracting agencies shall not contract with employers that permanently replace lawfully striking employees"
They were taken to court and the court and lost. Here's a summary of the result
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Reich upheld the ruling in Marbury v. Madison that actions of the executive branch can be subject to judicial review. It further clarified the principles by which the courts could determine which law should prevail when different statutes are in conflict. The decision stated that the Procurement Act cannot be interpreted to give the president authority to set procurement policy in such a way that it, in effect, regulates national labor policy.
The issues in Chamber of Commerce show how the constitutional system of checks and balances works. The decision clarifies that the broad powers invested in the president by acts of Congress must be used in ways that are constitutional and that also conform to the express intent of the legislature.
Read more: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Reich - Impact - Constitutional, Decision, President, and Policy - JRank Articles http://law.jrank.org/pages/25381/Chamber-Commerce-United-States-v-Reich-Impact.html#ixzz3J06RBLld
Pardoning and Granting Amnesty are two different things.
He CAN'T grant amnesty, but he can delay deportation and issue IDs giving legal status. He's hoping no one will be willing to take the IDs away at a later date
I hope you are right ...
There would be a clear "serparation of powers" case to bring forward to the SCOTUS -- as opposed to the idiotic lawsuit that Boehner has heretofore threatened to bring.
As a separation of powers issue, it would be an open and shut case -- meaning, with this court, a 5-4 majority.
Admittedly, this President would probably ignore the court -- just as he is ignoring Congress.
However, the benefit would be that any and all actions toward amnesty taken by the President would be ipso facto illegal from the outset. Accordingly, the next President could legitimately (and inarguably) erase them with his own pen.
I just sent this to Rush Limbaugh and requested he talk about it tomorrow. Need to get as many FReepers as possible to email him and make this go viral on his program. Rush email at ElRushbo@EIBnet.com
There have been suggestions that the forms and IDs may have already been printed up.
Many seemed to. It was just overshadowed.
How can a pardon for a specific crime be effectuated prior to conviction for said crime?
U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4
The Congress shall have Power … To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization
In each case Obama exceeds his authority congress should react in kind - if he declares amnesty, rather than 'shut down the government' congress should specifically remove any funding that would be used to implement the amnesty.
Treat the bastard like Pavlov's dog.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.