Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Update: Barber picks up more votes, McSally up by 179
Tucson Sentinel ^ | November 10, 2014

Posted on 11/10/2014 5:13:14 PM PST by SMGFan

Martha McSally held a dwindling lead over U.S. Rep. Ron Barber on Monday, up 179 votes as Pima County released new numbers around 5:30 p.m. Barber picked up another 162 votes in the spread as new tallies were reported, while a judge denied McSally's move to block the count of a number of provisional ballots.

(Excerpt) Read more at tucsonsentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2014 5:13:14 PM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

how much time are the Democrats given to cheat here?


2 posted on 11/10/2014 5:14:06 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; Nachum; narses

As usual.

Until they get enough votes to win. Then they stop re-re-re-re-re-counting votes.


3 posted on 11/10/2014 5:15:38 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

THIS SUX!


4 posted on 11/10/2014 5:16:49 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

As much as they need


5 posted on 11/10/2014 5:17:21 PM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

McSally lawyers fail to block some ballots

http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/McSally-lawyers-trying-to-block-some-ballots-5883510.php


6 posted on 11/10/2014 5:18:24 PM PST by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is now on twitter @RealSMG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

illegal ballots are okay I guess


7 posted on 11/10/2014 5:22:49 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

These recounts always seem to favor the same side... Must be the way the earth spins.


8 posted on 11/10/2014 5:23:47 PM PST by Temujinshordes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

RATS always steal close elections. That’s why the support voter fraud so loudly.


9 posted on 11/10/2014 5:24:11 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

The RATS WAR ON THIS WOMAN!


10 posted on 11/10/2014 5:29:41 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Slow motion theft in progress.


11 posted on 11/10/2014 5:31:55 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

They’re pulling an another “AlFranken” in Arizona


12 posted on 11/10/2014 5:38:33 PM PST by Bob Eimiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The Republicans don’t have to seat her. We still owe them for Rick McIntyre in 1984.


13 posted on 11/10/2014 5:39:36 PM PST by Dr. Sivana ("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
The recent research done in Maryland, which paired answers on potential juror's questionnaires with registration and voting records showed that a surprising number of non-citizens had voted in Maryland in 2010 and 2012. This was an excellent way to show non-citizen participation, which dilutes the votes of citizens.

It is hard enough to get people to work on your campaign while the campaign is ongoing, but it would be very difficult to rapidly assemble enough people to start pulling juror questionnaires and matching them with voting registration records in the district. If you could do it quickly, and if the extremely slow vote tabulation results in what we all fear, say Barber by 235, you need some ace in the hole to challenge the validity of the election. Like finding 400 non-citizens who cast ballots in the district last week. Someone should get to work.

14 posted on 11/10/2014 5:41:59 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Until the Dems win..or until Hillary invites McSally to Ft. Marcy Park.


15 posted on 11/10/2014 5:46:56 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
As usual.

Until they get enough votes to win. Then they stop re-re-re-re-re-counting votes.

I think in Texas you would have to keep recounting till there are no more votes to be counted. I worked on a congressional recount in 2010. It's required if you are going to recount an election, that all votes in a district contained within one county are recounted. The incumbent who lost on election night only wanted to recount the places that had paper ballots. That was easy in Cameron county where they had no electronic voting machines, just scannable paper ballots. In Nueces county we only had paper ballots for absentee ballots and emergency ballots. Just coincidentally a precinct in the Democrats' stronghold of Robstown just happened to have a power outage on election day, so we actually had a few emergency ballots to count. The incumbent congressman just wanted to recount the absentee ballots and emergency ballots in Nueces county. The county clerk informed his campaign that they would have to do a complete recount of the whole county or no recount at all. His campaign had to come up with something like $35,000 to recount the whole county. It was quite a production. First the County Clerk had the dedicated election counting equipment brought in, and all the memory cards were plugged in one after the other to re-tabulate the election day and in person early vote from the voting machines. As expected, the results were identical to the ones reported on election night. The next day we reported back, and the first order of business was to manually sort all the paper absentee ballots by precinct (they are normally scanned in the order received, but the computers do the work of assigning the results to particular precincts). After lunch we manually counted the sorted ballots. The results were identical precinct by precinct to the election night reports. This was the best possible result! In Cameron county the incumbent picked up a couple of hundred votes, but it wasn't anywhere close to enough votes to overcome the 799 vote lead the Republican challenger had on election night.

16 posted on 11/10/2014 6:43:14 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The fix is in?


17 posted on 11/10/2014 6:45:01 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
how much time are the Democrats given to cheat here?

Depends. How much do they need?

18 posted on 11/10/2014 6:47:10 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

“Provisional ballots” are the commie ‘RATS’ way of stealing elections. Every one of them are fraudulent, “box in the trunk” ballots. Anyone who says otherwise is a drooling, blithering idiot.


19 posted on 11/10/2014 8:26:00 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Ebola and Enterovirus-D68. Proud members of Viruses Without Borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

If we don’t win by 2% we don’t win. Simple as that.


20 posted on 11/10/2014 10:18:01 PM PST by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson