To: samtheman
As you say, it’s early. However, Wiscconsin really needs Scott Walker to work his magic in Madison for 4 more years.
To: afraidfortherepublic
8 posted on
11/10/2014 4:45:05 AM PST by
samtheman
To: afraidfortherepublic
As you say, its early. However, Wisconsin really needs Scott Walker to work his magic in Madison for 4 more years.
They get two more years, his understudy is a good woman, and if he became the Republican nominee, the loons in Madison will provide so many hilarious over the top quotables that the Dem nominee will not get any traction.
If Walker WINS the presidency, I pretty much expect Madison itself to look like the aftermath of a neutron bomb, with a few left wailing and grinding their teeth and rending their pink dresses on their segways.
18 posted on
11/10/2014 6:05:36 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
To: afraidfortherepublic
The country needs him more. You have a great Ltd Gov who will continue his work in Wisconsin.
25 posted on
11/10/2014 6:39:36 AM PST by
DLfromthedesert
(She accomplished nothing: should have stayed at home and baked cookies)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Wisconsin might just have to take one for the team. Walker is more needed in Washington, D. C. than in Madison, Wisconsin.
33 posted on
11/10/2014 7:16:59 AM PST by
CommerceComet
(Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I fear losing Scott as governor. He’d be a great president, but we’d have a high risk of going back the bad old days without him. We need him to stay here in WI. I back Ted Cruz for president.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson