Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Words Mean Anything, Obamacare Is In Real Trouble
American Spectaror ^ | 11/8/2014 | David Catron

Posted on 11/08/2014 9:58:45 AM PST by rootin tootin

The Supreme Court announced on Friday that it will hear a lawsuit challenging an arbitrary IRS decision to issue tax credits and penalties through federally created Obamacare exchanges. Two federal courts have already declared the regulation unconstitutional, but a third court ruled that the IRS has acted within its authority. It was this ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that prompted the plaintiffs in King v. Burwell to file an appeal with the high court. If the Supreme Court rules against the Obama administration in this case, it could well be the undoing of the reviled health care law.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; exchanges; irs; king; obamacare; obamacaresubsidies; scotus; scotusobamacare; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2014 9:58:45 AM PST by rootin tootin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

The Supremes saved it once, why not again?


2 posted on 11/08/2014 10:01:15 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Life is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

The problem is that “words” were also used to blackmail Roberts into voting with the administration on Obamacare rulings. I’ll keep my expectations in check.


3 posted on 11/08/2014 10:02:28 AM PST by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

Repeal is exactly what the voters wanted. This is very promising.


4 posted on 11/08/2014 10:03:00 AM PST by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

Roberts will screw us again, just watch


5 posted on 11/08/2014 10:05:27 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Tactical Firearms,Katy Tx: "the two enemies of guns, rust and politicians")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

I am not holding my breath on the outcome of this case, not this time. Just as I stopped waiting for the Apocalypse as announced by Art Bell in 1998, due to Hale-Bop type Comets.


6 posted on 11/08/2014 10:08:19 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

7 posted on 11/08/2014 10:09:45 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin
Another thread on FR today referring to Barney Frank's statement that there had been a "mistake" with regard to the provision in question also includes this statement:
"One of the key architects of of Obamacare, Jonathan Gruber, has explained that they specifically wanted subsidies available only to the state-established exchanges - to provide a strong carrot and stick to Governors and State legislatures to “play ball” with the Federal Government. They simply did NOT expect 36 States to turn down free Fed money."

This statement should be bolded and circulated widely.

Frank's statement, while he may not have intended to be so "frank" (pun intended), is a statement of fact which indicates the sheer arrogance of the Obama-Reid-Pelosi team and their rubber stamp Democrats.

Arrogance and an underestimation of the intelligence and will of "the People" who are their bosses in the States brought about this "mistake" which the Supreme Court should not legitimize by allowing any other interpretation of the word "mistake" when applied to the abominable Trojan Horse legislation masked as having to do with health care in America.

Gruber's description, coming from a complicit architect of ACA, should be accepted as evidence of intent, and "the People" and "States" have spoken!

8 posted on 11/08/2014 10:10:23 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

I am sure Roberts can write another argument not made by either side to justify ignoring the law.

Correct me if I am wrong, but when the legislature makes a mistake writing a law, isn’t their responsibility to amend that mistake?


9 posted on 11/08/2014 10:11:48 AM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

EXACTLY. Why would they change?


10 posted on 11/08/2014 10:12:37 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Obola brought to you by demorats. Hope you like your Change and live to tell it.ow pooh wash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

..... when the legislature makes a mistake writing a law, isn’t their responsibility to amend that mistake?

***********************************

Exactly the point one of the judges made when he ruled that the subsidies from the fed exchange were not legal.


11 posted on 11/08/2014 10:14:27 AM PST by Qiviut ( One of the most delightful things about a garden is the anticipation it provides. ~W.E. Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

“It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”
- John Roberts, 2010

“It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their grammatical choices.”
- John Roberts, 2015?


12 posted on 11/08/2014 10:14:28 AM PST by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

Does anyone know what tortured logic the judge used in ruling that it was permissible for the Feds to supply the credits in contravention of the clear language of the law?


13 posted on 11/08/2014 10:22:20 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

Roberts will approve the handing of tax payers funds to individuals that bitch they need the illegal redistribution of this money as part of their health insurance. So goes a clear indication of how the Supreme Court is crap.


14 posted on 11/08/2014 10:24:46 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown

lol


15 posted on 11/08/2014 10:28:07 AM PST by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

That’s exactly what’ they’ll do. The SCOTUS will “interpret” the wording to mean whatever they and Comrade Obama want it to mean.


16 posted on 11/08/2014 10:28:41 AM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rootin tootin

Even if by some miracle the court follows the law it won’t matter much because our leaders in the House and Senate will fix things right up.


17 posted on 11/08/2014 10:55:13 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

A thousand words.


18 posted on 11/08/2014 10:58:17 AM PST by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

To Roberts, words DON”T mean anything.


19 posted on 11/08/2014 11:27:56 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Does that count as “good behavior”? I don’t think so.


20 posted on 11/08/2014 8:53:45 PM PST by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson