Thanks... I knew it could be done!
My only comment on this entire article is this: “When a person or organization issues (verbal or written) a policy of NO EMAILS, it is most likely up to criminal activities.
I believe this is especially so for Obama’s Administration.
Would like to point out this is not invariably the case. People still talk remarkably freely in email, putting things in they'd never put into a formal letter. Functionally, it's the equivalent of recorded conversation.
The problem is that in conversation people often say stupid things, and what they say that isn't entirely stupid may be taken out of context or contrary to the writer's meaning and portrayed negatively in court.
I do investigations and expert witness work for attorneys, and the smarter ones have a policy of no email discussion of the case, except to set meetings, send documents, etc.
Not because they're trying to hide our team's criminality, but because they don't want preliminary discussion hauled out into court to be picked apart.