Posted on 10/24/2014 6:35:53 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
An Elizabeth Warren White House would be a place where men in the media or in Congress wouldnt be able to criticize her policy or political ideology or theyd risk being slapped as sexist.
At least thats the impression she left after a recent CNN appearance.
In the interview, she said, Its hard to change these big, male dominated institutions. ... You know, others have said it before me. If you dont have a seat at the table, youre probably on the menu.
A few things are evident from Warrens statement: First, she continues to push the phony War on Women propaganda, that if elected, shed bring straight to Pennsylvania Avenue. Second, she fails to understand the U.S. Constitution.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
Hiding behind her skirt?
Socialist?
Adriana Cohen 2016!
I’m having trouble picturing who’s menu Senator Warren’s picture would be on.
Paleface Lizzy Warren lied to try to take advantage of programs that were meant for minorities. She is just a dirty thief.
Conservatives need to endlessly tie her to Occupy Wall Street, recapping the horrific images of its appalling behavior:
VIDEO: Occupy Wall Street - Students occupied TD Bank 11.17.
VIDEO: Everyday Rebellion presents: Occupy Wall Street/Shut down Citibank, #S17
Minneapolis/St Paul Business Journal: Occupy Wall Street protesters close Wells Fargo HQ in S.F.
New York Times: For Some, Wall Street Is Main Street
Attack any black candidate on policies and you’re racist.
Attack any woman candidate on policies and you’re sexist.
Yet they demand equal treatment.
We’ve experimented with our first affirmative action president and that didn’t work out so well.
Time to start judging candidates by their actual qualifications and plans, America!
False.
Attack any black Democrat candidate on policies and youre racist.
Attack any woman Democrat candidate on policies and youre sexist.
You can attack black and women Republican candidates all you want.
I'd modify your statements to 'Criticize' for 'Attack' and 'issue' for 'policies' while adding the preface of 'liberal' because that would demonstrate the 'thin-skin' aspect of the modern left!
Electing a president who hides behind 'victimhood' is a demonstrably and now historically 'Bad Idea!'
Watching how Obama has been immune from criticism due to his race, why would she think otherwise?
Is Lie-A-Watha referring to those same "big, male dominated institutions" where she became a millionaire and rose to become a college professor, then a US Senator?
She doesn’t know what she is, so her contrivance isn’t surprising.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.