Adriana Cohen: Sen. Elizabeth Warren's contrived gender play

Boston Herald ^ | October 24, 2014 | Ariana Cohen

[ConservativeStatement]

An Elizabeth Warren White House would be a place where men in the media or in Congress wouldn’t be able to criticize her policy or political ideology or they’d risk being slapped as sexist.

At least that’s the impression she left after a recent CNN appearance.

In the interview, she said, “It’s hard to change these big, male dominated institutions. ... You know, others have said it before me. If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re probably on the menu.”

A few things are evident from Warren’s statement: First, she continues to push the phony War on Women propaganda, that if elected, she’d bring straight to Pennsylvania Avenue. Second, she fails to understand the U.S. Constitution.

[ConservativeStatement]

Doesn't understand the Constitution?

Hiding behind her skirt?

Socialist?

Adriana Cohen 2016!

[Steely Tom]

I’m having trouble picturing who’s menu Senator Warren’s picture would be on.

[blueunicorn6]

Paleface Lizzy Warren lied to try to take advantage of programs that were meant for minorities. She is just a dirty thief.

[Maceman]

I think Warren's biggest electoral vulnerability is her own damning words, in which she publicly claims to have created the looney, juvenile, business destroying, socially disruptive, disease-laded, out of control, intellectually bankrupt, philosophically incoherent, America-hating, unsanitary, disgusting, left-wing extremist temper-tantrum movement Occupy Wall Street:

“I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do,” she says. “I support what they do.”

Conservatives need to endlessly tie her to Occupy Wall Street, recapping the horrific images of its appalling behavior:

VIDEO: Occupy Wall Street - Students occupied TD Bank 11.17.

VIDEO: Everyday Rebellion presents: Occupy Wall Street/Shut down Citibank, #S17

Minneapolis/St Paul Business Journal: Occupy Wall Street protesters close Wells Fargo HQ in S.F.

New York Times: For Some, Wall Street Is Main Street

[TigerClaws]

Attack any black candidate on policies and you’re racist.

Attack any woman candidate on policies and you’re sexist.

Yet they demand equal treatment.

We’ve experimented with our first affirmative action president and that didn’t work out so well.

Time to start judging candidates by their actual qualifications and plans, America!

[Bubba_Leroy]

False.

Attack any black Democrat candidate on policies and you’re racist.

Attack any woman Democrat candidate on policies and you’re sexist.

You can attack black and women Republican candidates all you want.

[SES1066]

Attack any black candidate on policies and you’re racist.
Attack any woman candidate on policies and you’re sexist.

I'd modify your statements to 'Criticize' for 'Attack' and 'issue' for 'policies' while adding the preface of 'liberal' because that would demonstrate the 'thin-skin' aspect of the modern left!

Electing a president who hides behind 'victimhood' is a demonstrably and now historically 'Bad Idea!'

[Buckeye McFrog]

Watching how Obama has been immune from criticism due to his race, why would she think otherwise?

[Iron Munro]

“It’s hard to change these big, male dominated institutions. ... You know, others have said it before me. If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re probably on the menu.”

Is Lie-A-Watha referring to those same "big, male dominated institutions" where she became a millionaire and rose to become a college professor, then a US Senator?

[Vendome]

She doesn’t know what she is, so her contrivance isn’t surprising.