Must have been hard for the WaPo to put this on their website... probably in tears looking for a volunteer to hit the ENTER button...
Won’t matter. The gentle giants and little angels are all set to loot and riot.
I’m glad to see that there are some honest witnesses. They might want to consider moving out of the hood when this blows up.
Looks good for the home team, fellow freepers!
Leni
I am convinced that Democrats have been actively fanning the flames of Ferguson since the incident in an effort to nationalize the event and motivate the Black constituency to get out and vote. Plain and simple just anther attempt to fan racial hatred for nothing more than to get people to hate just enough so they go out and vote for their Democrat saviors. That is vote out those evil White people in favor of the “good” White Liberal masters.
This was a classic attempt to repeat the James Byrd chain dragging incident used against Bush.
Just about every major election season there just happens to be some major racial event that Democrats seek to construct into a national incident for no other purpose than to call Republicans racists so Democrats can benefit from the Black vote. It is disgusting, and so obvious.
You watch, something will happen again in 2016.
“...evidence...Wilson’s account of the shooting was correct...”
Well isn’t that inconvenient, for them.
but, but, but Wilson was white and, and, and....Brown was black....it was racial...right.
On the one hand the man could have been somebody regardless of his families income level or race, unfortunately he chose a life popular and considered normal amongst his people...thuggery, theft, drugs, ignorance. His life ended because of his choices.
This is not going to play for the night time theater crowd in Ferguson.
Zombie town is alive and well there. The crowd wants nothing less than scooping Officer Wilson’s brains out of his head and passing it around.
A simple lynching would not be enough.
Brown’s lawyer was quoted in an article here a few days ago as saying that he didn’t see any value in the forensic evidence, and he would depend on `eyewitness testimony’.
I’m curious whether his eyewitnesses’ recorded transcript testimony jives with the incontrovertible forensic evidence; e.g. “You said you witnessed the entire event. Did you ever see Michael Brown in the police car?”
Forensic evidence, done scientifically, isn’t mistaken & it doesn’t lie: FE has no ax to grind.
So it looks like the family’s attorney may be planning on winning in voir dire—jury selection—like the OJ Simpson lawyers: impugning state witnesses, histrionics and a direct appeal to the jurors’ prejudices.
Every failure by the BU is explained away by the libs as due to white racism. According to libs, no black has ever committed a crime or one that wasn't caused by the perfidious presence of white racism. Like every shooting of a black thug by the cops, the Dummies are claiming planting of evidence and lying by the police. I doubt we'll ever come to any agreement. Time to separate.