Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Leads Scattered 2016 GOP Field
ABC News ^ | October 19, 2014 | Ryan Struyk

Posted on 10/19/2014 12:40:55 PM PDT by Bettyprob

That would be Mitt Romney, supported for the GOP nomination by 21 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents. That’s double the support of his closest potential rival, but it also leaves 79 percent who prefer one of 13 other possible candidates tested, or none of them.

When Romney is excluded from the race, his supporters scatter, adding no clarity to the GOP free-for-all. In that scenario former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul have 12 or 13 percent support from leaned Republicans who are registered to vote. All others have support in the single digits.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; bencarson; huckabee; johnkasich; kasich; mikehuckabee; mittromney; randpaul; rickperry; romney; scottwalker; walker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
http://www.langerresearch.com/uploads/1163a52016.pdf

Romney: 21%
Bush: 10%
Huckabee: 10%
Paul: 9%
Christie: 8%
Carson: 6%
Rubio: 6%
Perry: 5%
Santorum: 4%
Cruz: 3%
Jindal: 1%
Kasich: 1%
Walker: 1%
No Opinion: 4%

When Romney is excluded from the poll, it's a virtual tie for first-place between Bush, Huckabee and Paul, with everyone else in single digits.

1 posted on 10/19/2014 12:40:55 PM PDT by Bettyprob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Romney?No,thank you.


2 posted on 10/19/2014 12:43:16 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Gosh, before the 2016 primaries start, the first name is the guy on whom 700 million dollars was spent promoting as the GOP candidate just 2 years ago.


3 posted on 10/19/2014 12:44:44 PM PDT by ansel12 ( LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nationÂ’s electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Because RINOs know how best to polish Democrat knobs.


4 posted on 10/19/2014 12:49:12 PM PDT by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Romney couldn’t beat a weakened Obama when he had the chance. So why would the party think that running the same tired horse again will win this time? It just doesn’t make any sense — unless you’re a Republican.


5 posted on 10/19/2014 12:52:57 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob
Romney Leads Scattered 2016 GOP Field

Who'd they poll? Every G*D* socialist between Stalingrad and Berlin? Every Lenin luvin', obama worshiping Hitler sycophant D*tard between socialist occupied connecticut and pervert plagued San Francisco?

There were certainly no conservatives involved and no real Republicans.

Go home, Mitt, use the magic seer stones to find a different hobby.

6 posted on 10/19/2014 12:54:49 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob
I see 11 names that are a Big

HELL NO!


7 posted on 10/19/2014 12:55:29 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 ((VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I concur.


8 posted on 10/19/2014 12:56:41 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

I can’t help but believe these polls are mainly name recognition though I would think there would be more name recognition for some of the others.

Curiously, this is similar to the Marist-McClatchy poll which I thought was mainly Iowa vs. this one that seems national.


9 posted on 10/19/2014 1:02:33 PM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
It's a stupid name recognition poll, at least for Romney. Everyone knows his name, why would he not be leading before anyone has officially announced? What's the point anyway, when Romney has said he's not going to run? It's as if the media is trying to coax him to make another go at it, perhaps to help give Clinton an easy path to the White House, as the Electable One™ face-plants for a third straight presidential race.
10 posted on 10/19/2014 1:02:35 PM PDT by Bettyprob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob; Jim Robinson

Leave it to a FR n00bie to pimp Romney again. You won’t find many takers here!


11 posted on 10/19/2014 1:03:19 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Valerie Jarrett warned us they would "get even with those who opposed them"..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Yep, it’s nothing.


12 posted on 10/19/2014 1:04:26 PM PDT by ansel12 ( LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nationÂ’s electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

No, they probably read the 700 post thread yesterday filled with RINO sycophants bemoaning rino losses, demanding we abandon principles and vote for more of them ‘no matter what’.

No need to poll socialists’ when cheshire conservatives will step up to the plate every single time they’re directed to.


13 posted on 10/19/2014 1:05:48 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

The only way Romney deserves even one look this time around, is if he comes out FIRMLY for American businesses, and repatriating businesses which are currently overseas.

Sorry but that is it. Same with any other candidates.

Romney be for the return of American industry. Or else shut up, and sit down this time.

Choose.


14 posted on 10/19/2014 1:05:53 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

If you believe anything he tells you, you really aren’t paying attention.


15 posted on 10/19/2014 1:07:34 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Yeah, buddy, my post #10, which preceded yours, is a real “pimping” for Romney, huh.

Embarrassing.


16 posted on 10/19/2014 1:12:36 PM PDT by Bettyprob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I’m just saying.

Unlike a lot of FReepers I settled on Romney last time around, after Palin dropped out. I thought he was most likely to win. And he ran strong, until the debates, at which point I don’t know what in the world happened to him, after one strong showing.

It was like, after the first debate, he went to sleep.

After that huge let-down, I am no longer for Romney.

With the exception, that I believe he (could) be a mighty force to bring back American industry.

In which case I would support him enthusiastically. But he would have to be completely for American industry. Robustly so. Militantly so, almost.

Otherwise he had a chance already. Last time around.

As things stand right now, no way.


17 posted on 10/19/2014 1:13:41 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

If Cruz gets in, he will win by a wide margin.


18 posted on 10/19/2014 1:16:58 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"With the exception, that I believe he (could) be a mighty force to bring back American industry.

In which case I would support him enthusiastically"

He's a queer lover, among other things, and that's a no-go for me.

Just saying.

Bring back men who don't pander to queers.

Now.

19 posted on 10/19/2014 1:17:05 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

THIS is why, as it stands now, we are going to get slaughtered in 2016. Yeah, yeah we all have our favorites and ones we like ... but we absolutely, 100% lack a leader.


20 posted on 10/19/2014 1:17:43 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson