Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This has been posted before, but I think it is an important piece of information in light of Fauxcahontas' latest pronouncements. An Elizabeth Warren pResidency would be eight more years of Valerie Jarrett as acting President.
1 posted on 10/13/2014 11:53:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

I hope that she takes on Hillary. Mark Warner may have blown it already. Thanks to an inside leak that turned on him whom I suspect is a Clinton operative.


2 posted on 10/13/2014 11:57:23 AM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m not surprised at all. Obama hates the Clintons (and vice-versa), knows Biden hasn’t got a snowball’s chance in hades of getting elected, and that Warren would be as radical (or even moreso) than him if elected.


3 posted on 10/13/2014 11:57:29 AM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo Man is always intense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In Valerie Jarrett’s dreams!

Val Jar has made some serious mistakes in her decisions these past six years - if those indeed were HER decisions. I suspect those were not her decisions but those passed on from a group in Chicago.


4 posted on 10/13/2014 11:59:33 AM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s all about who would be best at covering-up King Eboma’s crimes long after he leaves office.


5 posted on 10/13/2014 12:00:24 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What they doin’ in secret?


6 posted on 10/13/2014 12:02:07 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ed Klein is not a reliable source. Warren has been hitting Obama lately and that wouldn’t go over well with Jarrett. I’m inclined to not believe a word of this.


9 posted on 10/13/2014 12:03:24 PM PDT by Minsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is she a muslim too?


10 posted on 10/13/2014 12:04:16 PM PDT by TPOOH (I wish I could have been Jerry Reed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How?

(sorry that was insensitive of me to use Indian lingo)


14 posted on 10/13/2014 12:08:03 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

God help us all. Just the primaries listening to this idiots voice will be the death of many good people. She is a horrible person. Just horrible.


15 posted on 10/13/2014 12:08:08 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

VJ has to have an insider Communist win the Whitehouse. If a Republican takes it, she’ll be facing death for High Treason. The whole lot of them will.


16 posted on 10/13/2014 12:09:24 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If Warren runs for the nomination the Clinton’s will have a Chernobyl like meltdown.

Anything that promotes a civil war with the lefties is good .


17 posted on 10/13/2014 12:10:39 PM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If Warren runs against Hilary, then Hilary will look like the better choice because Warren is a nut. This might actually HELP Hilary Clinton rather than hurt her.


20 posted on 10/13/2014 12:12:16 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

On the one hand, Hillary is the most beatable of the Democratic hopefuls. Utterly lacking in any deep popularity, an undeniable mediocrity as a Senator, and the author as Secretary of State of the disaster which is the Middle East these days.

On the other hand, Warren is someone who actually isn’t a full owned-and-operated creature of the Wall Street - K Street establishment. Some of it is BS, but some of it is real. EVERYONE who isn’t a Beltway insider should be happy to see someone who is willing to challenge the Beltway consensus as a candidate for President.

If it were Warren vs Jeb, I think I’d vote for Jeb, but boy I’d be tempted to go the other way. A kick in the ass is a kick in the ass no matter what direction it comes from.


22 posted on 10/13/2014 12:13:59 PM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Valerie Jarrett is the first female President of the United States.

First foreigner, too.

24 posted on 10/13/2014 12:15:09 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I look forward to an awesome Hillary vs. Fauxcahontas fight.

Like Iran vs. Iraq, it's hard to find a side to root for, so just cheer on the bloodshed and hope it goes on for a long time.

27 posted on 10/13/2014 12:18:36 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where is a “breach of protocol” when you need it?
Can we get a two-fer??


31 posted on 10/13/2014 12:33:14 PM PDT by free from tyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The need a replacement even more gullible, vapid, and stupid than Obama.

And with Ms Dancing with Lies, they’ve found one of the few individuals who fit this requirement.


33 posted on 10/13/2014 12:36:16 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

The Democrat Machine rejected Hillary in 2008 and they will reject her again.

She is too corrupt and self-serving, even for the corrupt Democrat Machine.

They can’t trust her to do their bidding, versus her own.

JFK tried to go against them, and look what happened to him.

Of course, in JFK’s case - he tried to turn conservative on them. Hillary would never do that. But she would sell anyone out for a price. And the powers that be, can’t risk that.


37 posted on 10/13/2014 12:46:52 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hillary is every bit as vulnerable to an attack from the left as she was in 2008. If she’s the Chicago Mob front man for 2016, I think she’s in. The Mob proved their superiority over the Clinton Crime Family.


38 posted on 10/13/2014 12:48:35 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
...giving rise to speculations that the Massachusetts political newcomer is actually the administration’s choice to head the White House in 2016.

Head the White House? Did the Presidency become a committee on January 20, 2009 as part of Obola's fundamental transformation?

40 posted on 10/13/2014 12:54:48 PM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson