Posted on 10/09/2014 5:20:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
Actor Ben Affleck, star of the hit film "Gone Girl," recently appeared on Bill Maher's HBO show along with Sam Harris, author of the book "Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion." Maher and Harris accused Affleck of ignoring the extent of intolerance within Islam.
Maher said: "Liberals need to stand up for liberal principles ... like freedom of speech, freedom to practice any religion you want without fear of violence, freedom to leave a religion, equality for women, equality for minorities -- including homosexuals. These are liberal principles that liberals applaud for. But then when you say, 'In the Muslim world, this is what's lacking,' then they get upset."
Harris concurred: "Liberals have really failed on the topic of theocracy. They'll criticize white theocracy. They'll criticize Christians. They'll still get agitated over the abortion clinic bombing that happened in 1984. But when you want to talk about the treatment of women and homosexuals and freethinkers and public intellectuals in the Muslim world, I would argue that liberals have failed us. ... The crucial point of confusion is that we have been sold this meme of Islamophobia, where every criticism of the doctrine of Islam gets conflated with bigotry towards Muslims as people. That's intellectually ridiculous."
Affleck, who informed us that our rights came from our "forefathers," called this analysis "racist." He sniffed: "Are you the person who understands the officially codified doctrine of Islam? You're the interpreter of that?"
For the record, Affleck dropped out of University of Vermont after one semester, and Occidental College after one year. Harris has an undergraduate degree from Stanford and a PhD in cognitive neuroscience from UCLA. On the other hand, Harris never starred in "Argo," a film about rescuing American hostages held in Iran, which apparently makes Affleck an expert on Islam and Middle Eastern politics.
Harris agreed that not all Muslims want to strap on bombs and blow things up. But he said: "Just imagine some concentric circles. ... At the center, you have jihadists -- these are people who wake up in the morning wanting to kill apostates, wanting to die trying. They believe in paradise; they believe in martyrdom. Outside of them, we have Islamists -- these are people who are just as convinced of martyrdom and paradise and wanting to foist their religion on the rest of humanity, but they want to work within the system. They're not going to blow themselves up on a bus. They want to change governments. They want to use democracy against itself. Those two circles arguably are 20 percent of the Muslim world. ... But outside of that circle you have conservative Muslims who can honestly look at ISIS and say, "that does not represent us; we're horrified by that." But they hold views about human rights, and about women and about homosexuals that are deeply troubling."
Affleck grimaced as if he'd just seen the box office returns for "Gigli."
Maher added: "One reason (Muslims who oppose jihadists and extreme acts) don't get exposed is because they're afraid to speak out, because it's the only religion that acts like the mafia -- that will f---ing kill you if you say the wrong thing, draw the wrong picture or write the wrong book. There's a reason why Ayaan Hirsi Ali needs bodyguards 24/7."
"It's racist," Affleck insisted, no different from stereotyping Jews or blacks.
Maher responded: "I can show you a Pew poll of Egyptians. They are not outliers in the Muslims world. It's like 90 percent of them believe death is the appropriate response to leaving the religion. If 90 percent of Brazilians thought that death was the appropriate response to leaving Catholicism you would think it was a bigger deal."
Poor Affleck -- not so easy without a script.
Conservative pundits have praised Maher for "telling the truth" about Islam. Maher, they applaud, effectively explained how Islam -- at least how many followers interpret Islam -- makes their religion disturbingly different than any other dominant religion.
But Maher's made a career out of attacking all believers as equally moronic and manipulated, steeped in superstition and hocus-pocus whether Jew, Christian or Muslim.
Just six years ago, Maher made a documentary called "Religulous." In an almost Borat-like fashion, Maher interviews and then mocks Christians and other believers, but mostly Christians. Maher mocked the Christian belief in the rapture as intensely as he mocks Osama bin Laden for his belief in a global caliphate.
Maher ends his film with an exhortation for rational thinkers of the world to disavow all religions as vehicles used by bad people to exploit the mindless for their own purposes: "The plain fact is, religion must die for mankind to live. The hour is getting very late to be able to indulge in having key decisions made by religious people, by irrationalists. ... And those who preach faith and enable and elevate it are intellectual slaveholders, keeping mankind in a bondage to fantasy and nonsense that has spawned and justified so much lunacy and destruction."
Note the distinction Maher made between Christianity and other faiths and radical Islam? What, no distinction?
Bill Maher isn’t a fool. That’s more than I can say for Ben Affleck, who’s a dhimmi idiot.
If religion dies (and I am excluding islam from the definition and the discussion), what forms the basis for morality? For right and wrong? For crime and punishment? Can you cite for me one society in our long bloody history, that was atheistic and benevolent and rights-oriented?
Amazing that his career wasn't sunk by that turkey.
Show business kids making movies of themselves
You know they don't give a f**k about anybody else...
Bunch of damn lotus eaters...
Why should Maher’s mouthed words count?
An apology from his direction holds no more weight than his opinion of anything - especially himself.
Affleck is flatlining.
As IF, former car park attendants, spouse-beating, bed-hopping druggies, former porn stars and former manicurists can figure out something the rest of us are incapable of doing!
Really??
Bill Maher is a perfect candidate for a “Damascus Road” experience.
In the last century, anti-religious types have killed at least an order of magnitude more innocent people than religious types.
And Christians have killed, for what they believe to be Christian reasons, very nearly zero innocents during this period. Muslims have killed a great many more for what they believe to be Islamic reasons.
Go back a ways in history, and the comparisons get a lot less clear cut. But for the last century or two, the comparison between the three groups is as clear as can be.
I tell them, "Yes, and 500 million years ago, dinosaurs roamed Manhattan, but I don't live in either of those times, so I don't worry about dinosaurs or Christians trying to kill me!"
Can’t stand this HBO homo.
I think it’s just a ratings gimmick.
Bill Maher stands on what he believes, even to the concern of others who don’t believe as he does. I can respect that.
Ben Affleck, who makes a living from speaking words, and evoking emotions, written by others who are smarter than him, attempted to demonstrate his intellige4nce by stating that being anti-”islam” is “racist”.
I will differ with Affleck, and here is why:
Here are the groups of Mohammedans, NOT based between Syria and Tunisia:
Filipinos - remember the Huks?
Thais - half the southern peninsula of Thailand
Indonesia is riddled with Mohameddans
A few of the ‘Stans that were part of the USSR
peoples of the Balkans.
So, Mr. Affleck, there are more peoples, than I believe, that you know, that call themselves mohammedans, and they are all dangerous.
If “religion dies” ...you have ISLAM! What an idiot.
He said anti-Islam = racist.
Well I'm sorry to say, BEN... but Islam is NOT a race. I have my own ideas about what Islam IS, but I'd get into all kinds of trouble saying so!
In the mean time and since YOU claim to know way more than the rest of the world... YOU tell US what Islam IS... I'd bet everything I own that you couldn't do that if your life depended on it!
Maher said: “Liberals need to stand up for liberal principles ... like freedom of speech, freedom to practice any religion you want without fear of violence, freedom to leave a religion, equality for women, equality for minorities —
Liberals are against all of this.
There you have it, it’s racist. Ben Affleck said so, and now it’s settled science, pretty much.
Quite.
However, this is where I break company with many of the anti-Islam crowd.
Both Judaism and Christianity have episodes in their past of extreme violence for religious reasons. Both religions have for practical purposes evolved out of this.
I see no reason Islam cannot do the same, though admittedly it will be more difficult due to the centrality of religious violence to the faith.
It's certainly possible, but I don't live in that time either.
Agreed.
There is, however, a difference between recognizing that Islam has not yet changed and claiming that it cannot change and therefore the only possible answer is a “final solution to the Muslim problem.”
Just realized post 19 didn’t come out the way I intended.
Did not mean to imply YOU were in favor of genocidal solutions to our problems with Islam. The comment was intended to be addressed to those who claim Islam simply cannot change and that the present situation is intolerable.
If you accept those two premises fully, the only reasonable answer is to get rid of Islam by getting rid of Muslims. Or possibly force them to abandon their faith, which has its own problems given our belief in religious freedom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.