Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Record 55,553,000 Women Not Participating in Labor Force
Cybercast News Service ^ | October 3, 2014 - 9:48 AM | Ali Meyer

Posted on 10/03/2014 10:11:48 AM PDT by Olog-hai

A record 55,553,000 women 16 years and older did not participate in the labor force in September, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This means that 55,553,000 women in the United States did not have a job and did not actively seek one in the past four weeks.

The number of women not in the labor force increased from 55,345,000 in August to 55,553,000 in September, an increase of 208,000. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: laborforce; liberalagenda; realwaronwomen; unemployedwomen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 10/03/2014 10:11:48 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good, more kitchens (wo)manned and ready, then.


2 posted on 10/03/2014 10:16:05 AM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Heaven forbid they choose to be stay-at-home moms and raise good citizens - time to have traditional family life and to counteract the propaganda from the gov’t indoctrination camps, aka public schools


3 posted on 10/03/2014 10:16:54 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Dishes and dirty laundry are piling up everywhere.


4 posted on 10/03/2014 10:17:21 AM PDT by Beagle8U (If illegal aliens are undocumented immigrants, then shoplifters are undocumented customers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I've been showing the participation chart for women and how it corresponds to overall participation for the last two years. Peak male participation was in the 1950's and has been declining ever since. Posted all the charts this morning.
5 posted on 10/03/2014 10:18:59 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Republicrats war on women obviously.


6 posted on 10/03/2014 10:19:32 AM PDT by rktman ("The only thing dumber than a brood hen is a New York democrat." Mother Abagail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Why bother? Uncle Sugar's got them covered.


7 posted on 10/03/2014 10:25:06 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Bad economy, employment down - women and children hurt most.

Patriarchy was good for women, but they voted for the tyranny of the state instead.

8 posted on 10/03/2014 10:26:44 AM PDT by DaveyB ("When injustice becomes the law; rebellion becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

My first thoughts too. Is 55,553,000 women home washing dishes, baking cookies and raising kids really such a BAD thing?


9 posted on 10/03/2014 10:34:33 AM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Don’t worry, their husband* works.

*The state, paid for by you and me.


10 posted on 10/03/2014 10:42:40 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

My first thoughts too. Is 55,553,000 women home washing dishes, baking cookies and raising kids really such a BAD thing?


In the 50’s, no.

Now they are welfare moms.


11 posted on 10/03/2014 10:43:58 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

In the days when one person could provide for the home financially, no it wasn’t really such a bad thing.

Today when two people can barely make it, it is.

Imagine more pressure on businesses to raise pay scales.

Bye bye more jobs...

No, not a good thing at all.


12 posted on 10/03/2014 10:45:01 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Stay home, have babies, vote Democrat, and live happily ever after.


13 posted on 10/03/2014 10:47:22 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war,and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Chapter Jackson sings a song about it....

14 posted on 10/03/2014 10:58:06 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

I wish I was.

home washing dishes, baking cookies


15 posted on 10/03/2014 11:05:14 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
Heaven forbid they choose to be stay-at-home moms and raise good citizens

That would be nice, but I suspect they may be riding around in submarines instead.

16 posted on 10/03/2014 11:06:07 AM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A considerable plurality of young women aren’t staying at home and being wives and mothers, they’re in college. Women now outnumber men in colleges and universities, both public and private. 18-24 year old full time students tend not to be in the labor force, though some are.

Public colleges and universities have a male-female ratio of 44% male–56% female. Private not-for-profit institutions have a male-female enrollment ratio of 43% male-57% female and for all private schools (non-profit and for profit) the ratio is 41% male-59% female.

The female domination of higher education prevails across all types of schools in higher education.

The national male-female population ratio for 18-24 year olds is 51% male-49% female, meaning there are more college-aged males than females.


17 posted on 10/03/2014 11:17:48 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Wow. The Obummer administration only needs 2,555 more women to make this a very cool number.


18 posted on 10/03/2014 11:46:59 AM PDT by Tudorfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; LucyT; Jane Long; Morgana; yorkiemom; beaversmom; ladyjane; BuckeyeTexan; RitaOK; ...

All I can think of is a great big Democrat Party W. O. W. !

W.O.W., being short for War On Women, of course.


19 posted on 10/03/2014 11:58:55 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

The democracks are very fond of suffering....other peoples sufferings


20 posted on 10/03/2014 12:14:23 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson