More shenanigans by the commie ‘RATS and their “judges”.
Oh but wouldn’t those Democrat voters be disenfranchised if they had no one to vote for? (see judge Surrick in Berg v. Obama)
Back a few years in New Jersey, a democrat cadre of judges insisted that the citizens deserved an option to vote for a democrat after the torch dropped out of the race. Now, a new group of democrat judges reject the right of democrats to vote for a member of their party. What a collection of corrupt individuals.
We don’ need no steenkin’ laws!
It is amazing how Democrats always win in the Courts.
1. The Plaintiff didn’t show up in Court. That was the deathknell.
2. Any other cases in any other States are irrelevant. This is a State case. I don’t care what happened elsewhere it means nothing here.
3. I read the statute and it’s pretty clear that the Dims are NOT required to run anyone. It says who is to appoint someone but not that they have to appoint someone.
This was a pretty easy case. It’s all well and good to run screaming “Dim judges! Laws don’t apply! etc etc etc”. But that doesn’t get us anywhere. You have to analyze facts and not just run around screaming. If you don’t, you don’t know who caused your problem. It wasn’t the Dims here. Not one bit. It was the GOP and it’s raging incompetence. The AG was absolutely brain dead on this one. And the Plaintiff not showing? (a supposed Dim) ... I mean come on.
No wonder the GOPe ignores us. They could drop an anvil on our car, we could see them do it, and we would blame the Dims.
I wouldn’t take us seriously either.
But they DO have a nominee... he’s just running as an “Independent”