Posted on 10/01/2014 5:29:56 PM PDT by markomalley
Supreme CourtJustice Antonin Scalia said Wednesday that secularists are wrong when they argue the Constitution requires religious references to be banished from the public square.
Justice Scalia, part of the courts conservative wing, was preaching to the choir when he told the audience at Colorado Christian University that a battle is underway over whether to allow religion in public life, from referencing God in the Pledge of Allegiance to holding prayers before city hall meetings.
I think the main fight is to dissuade Americans from what the secularists are trying to persuade them to be true: that the separation of church and state means that the government cannot favor religion over nonreligion, Justice Scalia said.
Thats a possible way to run a political system. The Europeans run it that way, Justice Scalia said. And if the American people want to do it, I suppose they can enact that by statute. But to say thats what the Constitution requires is utterly absurd.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Their is no separation of Church and State under Sharia law.
Nor is there any such separation in America. All that has been done is that the cult of liberalism has replaced Christianity
he’s right.
the public square can be full of all of them. government just can’t make one its national religion. and selecting different denominations to offer prayers for different things/events isn’t doing that.
>> Nor is there any such separation in America.
If by America you’re referring to the Constitution.
The koran does not have the passage “Render unto Ceasar.”
Atheism is a religion.
A sample of Kirk's wisdom can be found in the following closing excerpted paragraphs:
Restoring Religious InsightsIn conclusion, it is my argument that the elaborate civilization we have known stands in peril; that it may expire of lethargy, or be destroyed by violence, or perish, from a combination of both evils. We who think that life remains worth living ought to address ourselves to means by which a restoration of our culture may be achieved. A prime necessity for us is to restore an apprehension of religious insights in our clumsy apparatus of public instruction, which -bullied by militant secular humanists and presumptuous federal courts-has been left with only ruinous answers to the ultimate questions.
What ails modern civilization? Fundamentally, our society's affliction is the decay of religious belief. If a culture is to survive and flourish, it must not be severed from the religious vision out of which it arose. The high necessity of reflective men and women, then, is to labor for the restoration of religious teachings as a credible body of doctrine.
"Redeem the time; redeem the dream," T. S. Eliot wrote. It remains possible, given right reason and moral imagination, to confront boldly the age's disorders. The restoration of true learning, humane and scientific; the reform of many public policies; the renewal of our awareness of a transcendent order, and of the presence of an Other, the brightening of the comers where we find ourselves such approaches are open to those among the rising generation who look for a purpose in life. It is just conceivable that we may be given a Sign before the end of the twentieth century; yet Sign or no Sign, Remnant must strive against the follies of the time. - Russell Kirk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.