Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

Unfortunately, Great Britain found it necessary to honor the lease and its term for expiration. It may be argued that the termination of the lease could have reverted control back to the Chinese government in Taiwan, but the various legal impediments to doing so are also reinforced with the practical problem in which Hong Kong was militarily indefensible against an invasion by the Peoples Republic of China (PRC).


6 posted on 09/30/2014 9:22:28 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

Hong Kong was ceded in perpetuity. It was the 99 year lease on the New Territories that ran out.

The British felt they couldn’t maintain Hong Kong without the water and resources from the leased territory.

It’s quite a raw deal for people from Hong Kong.

It’s great after 17 years they are still standing up for themselves.


9 posted on 09/30/2014 9:28:04 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

honor a treaty that was not made with the communist Chinese government.

They should have turned it over to Taiwan!!


24 posted on 09/30/2014 10:23:29 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson