Posted on 09/26/2014 1:10:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
There's a big battle brewing in the Jefferson County, Colorado, school system. The manufactured controversy over a proposed curriculum review is generating national headlines. But the fight is not about what misguided students and biased reporters say it's about. "Censorship" is a red herring. The real issue is union control.
Here's the deal: Public school teachers in this Denver-area district walked out of their classrooms this week to protest the implementation of performance-based pay. The JeffCo school board approved the new compensation system last week, which rewards the most highly effective teachers with 4.2 percent raises, effective teachers with 2.4 raises and inferior teachers with nothing. Only 2 percent of teachers received no pay raises.
One fact the grievance-mongering teachers conveniently left out of their politicized pep talks to student sympathizers: The board gave bonuses to 450 teachers who would have otherwise received no raises under the union's arbitrary step scale. The old system didn't take performance into any consideration at all.
Despite the hefty rewards for teacher competence and excellence, disgruntled union leaders called for a strike last Friday (or as they prefer to whitewash it, a "sickout"). The Big Labor avengers succeeded in shutting down two schools -- and enlisting students to protest with them. But the optics of robbing kids of valuable educational time to protest an $18.2 million salary compensation package did not play well with taxpayers.
Enter the "censorship" fakeout.
At the same board meeting where the new pay system was approved, elected school board members heard a proposal to form a curriculum review committee. Under the state constitution, elected local school boards are responsible for instructional and curriculum matters. It's their duty. The proposal called for the creation of a new, nine-member panel "to review curricular choices for conformity to JeffCo academic standards, accuracy and omissions, and to inform the board of any objectionable materials."
The panel's first review items would be the elementary health curriculum and the A.P. U.S. History (APUSH) curriculum, which has undergone a radical revamp over the past few years.
The chief architect of the APUSH revisions is David Coleman, a progressive ideologue who is also one of the prime movers and shakers behind the Common Core standards scheme. Objections to the shoddy, intrusive, costly, top-down, backroom-designed Common Core agenda cross party lines. Rank-and-file teachers across the country have joined a diverse anti-Common Core coalition of parents, administrators, scholars, grassroots activists, privacy advocates and anti-cronyism watchdogs.
The JeffCo school board takes its deliberative role seriously. The proposal is the opposite of censorship. The debate over history standards is part of a wider battle between left-leaning militant teachers' unions, who explicitly see their primary role as Saul Alinsky-trained political agitators, and those who want to restore academic excellence, rigor and ideological balance in the schools.
While every liberal "-ism" has been incorporated into the school day -- from environmentalism and collectivism to social justice activism to mandatory volunteerism, feminism and transgenderism -- JeffCo school board members are now being mocked for simply proposing that citizenship, individualism and patriotism have a fundamental place at the schoolteacher's table.
Somehow, this perfectly reasonable proposal morphed into "JeffCo wants to remove slavery from the history curriculum!" Next thing you know, students were walking out of class two days in a row this week with "We (Heart) Our Teachers" signs. And the liberal Denver Post was running propaganda stories on Twitter mockery of the school board.
"It upsets me greatly to see children being used as pawns and missing educational time," school board president Ken Witt told me. And "we're not just going to rubber-stamp" the top-down APUSH changes, he says. But the bigger picture, Witt points out, is that the district's "union contract expires in August. It will be entirely redrafted." The agitators' ultimate goal is "to create turmoil and discredit board before those negotiations."
And they are trying to do so by any means necessary -- including misleading kids, spreading falsehoods in the classroom and instigating walkouts through student-managed organizing websites.
The parting words of former top National Education Association lawyer Bob Chanin a few years ago in explaining the union's main agenda say it all. After calling conservative opponents "bastards," he said:
"This is not to say that the concern of NEA and its affiliates with closing achievement gaps, reducing dropout rates, improving teacher quality and the like are unimportant or inappropriate. To the contrary -- these are the goals that guide the work we do. But they need not and must not be achieved at the expense of due process, employee rights and collective bargaining. That simply is too high a price to pay.
Listen up, class. For public employee union leaders, it's not really about the children or academic excellence or curricular freedom. It's about their own political self-preservation. Always.
bet none of the students protesting know what the 3 branches of the federal govts are and why the Founders made it such. I doubt these students know how many judges are on the Supreme Court, how many governors Colorado has, when Colorado became a state and other state history.
The simplest test here, which ought to be required as you graduate high school....hand the kid a can of Coke, and ask them to define how Coke exists under capitalism and commerce....how they buy the products overseas, get them shipped to some port, trucked to some plant, blended into Coke, pass a health inspection, get trucked to Piggly Wiggly, and resold to them at whatever price you paid.
I would agree....history, economics, geography, civics, and commerce are simply not taught to any level where people grasp the big picture of what exists in the nation today, and why we are the way we are.
I’d also agree that we don’t challenge kids, to push them a bit.
Our entire public education system seems to exist for the benefit of the NEA and the AFT. Teaching and education? What’s that?
These kids need a better hobby than to demonstrate their own epic generational FAIL!
Bookmark.
Thanks for posting a good article. The NEA doesn’t care about students; only union dues and tenure.
Nowhere is that more obvious than NJ, though with a minor correction: The public education system exists for the benefit of the teachers’ unions’ political arm, the Democratic Party. Nowhere is this more clear than in NJ, where they are bankrupting the taxpayers while funneling massive amounts of money to their commissars. They are the perfect political operatives, involuntarily funded by their opposition, present in every locality, and determined to keep their stranglehold on the taxpayer hosts. In Mexico they are more open about their goals; here they still pose as productive loyal citizens...
I went to one NEA conference with rose colored glasses on. I went to one and only one. It is about dues, discounts, tenure and excoriating conservatives. I had a great educational career albeit a lonely one being a conservative, that is.
I went to work when I was 17 in the divisional offices of a nationwide grocery shain. I worked for many employers until I was about 40, when I went out on my own as a self-employed bookkeeper.
EVERY SINGLE one of my individual raises was based upon my PERFORMANCE.
It is beyond disgusting that the persons trusted with educating the children who are expected to be the next generation of employable workers are willing to do anything to cheat the system.
I say fire all of them—revoke every single penny of all of their pensions & blackball them from working anywhere within the education system for the rest of their lives.
Make sure they never can be on any ‘school board’, either.
I don’t care if they can only dig ditches for the rest of their lives.
shain.””
chain oops
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.