Posted on 09/24/2014 5:09:18 AM PDT by rellimpank
With an op ed like this, there are three possibly results.
1. As you found.
2. Biologically “female”, but androgynous.
3. Beta male.
Yes, men like Washington and Mason spent their own money to finance the war.
But they were not alone. Wealthy men north and south pledged their lives, their honor and their fortunes to the cause of freedom
Too bad the writer doesn’t go to AFRICA where his people have been and continue today, to Hold Their fellow man in Slavery, and they have for 1500 years. Black Slaves are bought and sold by Black Slave Owners in public almost everywhere on the African Continent, every single day.
Only the White Man abolished Slavery, anywhere in the world.
the point of not having women vote...was that by and large they vote for welfare
Not allowing Women to Vote came from them being dependent on their husbands and men in general, just like children are dependent on their families til a certain age. Allowing Women to Vote was the first Step in Destroying the American Family. Up until then The Man voted for his Family and the Family remained UNIFIED.
The same principle was applied to Non-Property Owners having ANY say in the Public Business, for they had No Stake in the game.
I still agree with both these sentiments.
Oh, I agree. Teachers should be humiliated by the claim none of hem are stable enough to be trusted with a gun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.