Revolution, civil war or expatriation. Choose.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The most fundamental reason for civil disorder in 1967 was the racial attitude and behavior of white Americans toward black Americans.
When someone other than a leftist does this, it’s called “blaming the victim”.
2 posted on
09/14/2014 4:16:41 PM PDT by
Boogieman
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sure...of course....why didn't somebody think of that before? Simply electing black officials in majority black areas will propel young black people (who previously were living in situations of evil oppression under white officials) up to parity with young, white people.
Everything will be made equal, the waters will quit flooding, volcanoes stop erupting, the planet will be healed. But in the meantime let black youngsters walk in the middle of the street so they can feel like they have some share in the game. Gee whiz, these law professors know everything. (snicker)
3 posted on
09/14/2014 4:17:39 PM PDT by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The most fundamental reason for civil disorder in 2014 is the racial attitude and behavior of black Americans.
There is no time for investigation, no time for a grand jury, just demands for immediate “justice” made by a lynch mob.
4 posted on
09/14/2014 4:17:52 PM PDT by
Ray76
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No one from the Ferguson community is expressing concern for the little store clerk the “gentle giant” jerked around. This tells me all I need to know about the character of Ferguson’s residents..
5 posted on
09/14/2014 4:18:09 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Blacks are just ticked off because “The One” didn’t give them their “free sh*t”. They didn’t get their free cars, and free houses, all they got was an Obamaphone.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Revolution, civil war or expatriation. Choose.”
It boils down to pretty much that, doesn’t it? Not very attractive choices.
7 posted on
09/14/2014 4:24:34 PM PDT by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I choose expatriation.
They claim to be Africans.
Do savages belong in a civilized society?
Expatriate their mommas with em. They failed to raise a civilized citizen even when we paid them to do so. I'd say ship off their fathers too, but LBJ beat us to that.
10 posted on
09/14/2014 4:48:56 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I subscribe to repatriation. Liberia was founded as a homeland for freed slaves. I propose to free black Americans from their slavery to the Democrat Party and entitlements. A bag of $20,000 when they step off the one way flight to Liberia. Once on the ground and checked through customs and immigration, they will sign paperwork surrendering their U.S. citizenship and passports. Welcome to your new home in Liberia, expatriates.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let's be real folks. Back in the 60s, blacks had probable cause to riot. They WERE treated like crap.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
..action against local symbols of white American society, authority and property.." So... if you want 'em to break a sweat that doesn't involve bassetball....
16 posted on
09/14/2014 5:54:12 PM PDT by
Feckless
(I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The commissions proposed solution was not equality, but equity. De jure equality, meaning everyone is promised the same amount of access, the declaration of a colorblind society, already existed in 1967 because of the Civil_Rights_Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The commission recognized that it was too late for de jure equality. Equity, granting more to those who need the most, was the cure: Only a commitment to national action on an unprecedented scale can shape a future compatible with the historic ideals of American society. 1967.
After almost 50 years, how did that work out?
Did the inability of the blacks to hack it in a free society then as now, improve by making national pets out of them?
Arguably, did "giving" the presidency to a black man because it was "the right thing to do," as he is so fond of saying, change reality? Or did it simple diminish the rights of the other 270,000,000 Americans, as well as their financial well being with no visible positive results?
What's the point of this thread? That since we can't force the blacks to excel on their own, we must by law force all others to reduce their IQ, and ignore their abilities, ambition and achievements?
That's not gonna happen.
I can't think of any culture in history which has pulled that one off.
In fiction, the closest we have come is the dystopic society displayed in the movie, Idiocracy...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson