Posted on 09/08/2014 2:07:27 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
I always thought it would be difficult to imagine a period in which the West would be more adrift than the 1970s. Being a child at the time, I was spared consciousness of most of that miserable decade. Thus far, however, the second decade of the 2000s seems likely to give the 10 years that spawned Watergate, stagflation, the Carter presidency, the Oil Crisis, Idi Amin, the Baader-Meinhof Gang, Jim Jones, Pol Pot, the Red Brigades, and the Iranian Revolution (to name just a few of the star attractions) a serious run for its money as a byword for Western decline. ADVERTISEMENT
One everyday sign of this malaise is the fact that much of the West remains, as in the seventies, mired in what’s now called the Long Slump. And persistently unhealthy economies are usually symptomatic of an unwillingness to acknowledge deeper problems. Examples are most Western governments’ reluctance to accept that it’s game-over for the regulatory and welfare state as-we-knew-it, or to do something about the growing cancer of crony-capitalism.
Sometimes, however, an event occurs that highlights the more fundamental crises that bedevil a civilization. The rise of a movement as diabolical as ISIS, for instance, has surely underscored the bankruptcy of what might be called the sentimental humanitarian outlook that dominates so many contemporary shapers of the West’s cultural consensus.
Sentimental humanitarianism has several features. One is the mind-set that reduces evil to structural causes. “Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains,” proclaimed Rousseau in his Du contrat social. From this, many concluded that evil would disappearif the right people were put in charge to change the structures.
Sentimental humanitarianism also assumes that all religions are more-or-less the same and, given the right conditions, will vacillate their way towards....
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
".....In the end, the sick choice to behead someone — or kidnap people’s daughters, or incarcerate enemies-of-the-revolution in a Gulag, or herd Jews into gas chambers — is a free choice to do evil that can’t be explained away by the fact that others are wealthier than you........"
The ultimate in social justice must be something like Paradise, however unimaginable. We’re too busy dreaming in unattainable “perfect world” scenarios. If a global survey were taken on what constitutes a perfect world there would be an impossible amount of disagreement and disparity among participants.
The reality is the black and brown people of the world hate us...because they can. Many of them don't want peace..they want to kill us. And Putin proves that it's not just brown people...many white people still like the idea of being a tyrant. Human nature.
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=24376
“.........................Conservatives who think progressives are misinformed idealists will forever be blind-sided by the malice of the left—by the cynicism of those who pride themselves on principle, by the viciousness of those who champion sensitivity, by the intolerance of those who call themselves liberal, and by the ruthless disregard for the well-being of the downtrodden by those who preen themselves as social saints.
Conservatives are caught by surprise because they see progressives as merely misguided, when in fact they are fundamentally misdirected. They are the messianists of a religious faith. But it is a false faith and a self-serving religion. Since the redeemed future that justifies their existence and rationalizes their hypocrisy can never be realized, what really motivates progressives is a modern idolatry: their limitless passion for the continuance of Them.”
The Left is only militant against conservative Christians. It is powerless to confront any other ideology and is especially impotent when faced with murderous Islam. Their heads will roll in the dirt first.
This is the root problem, and why the Left is inherently incapable of resisting Mohammedanism.
Mohammedans hate us. Don't confuse that with race. Christianity is flourishing in Africa and spreading rapidly in China.
Sorry...my point was that no matter how much love and good will you expend to certain people, many of them will still hate you and want to do violence to you. I was simply commenting on Lennon’s and other naive lib dreamers belief that simply wishing things were wonderful does not make it so.
What a brilliant article. Could have been written this morning. Horowitz knows because he has been there.
I agree with freeper St Thomas Aquinas. The reason white people advanced is Christianity, not race. Christianity took root around its Mediterranean center and spread upward and westward, eventually resulting in an entire nation, America, dedicated to Christ by the first European pilgrims to colonize it. The reason the West is now falling back is renunciation of Christianty.
“Soft liberalism is incapable of confronting the evil in man”
Right conclusion but the wrong reason -
“liberalism” is simply the political expression of the religion of
HUMANISM
which actually REJECTS the “evil in man” and places the blame nearly entirely on environment.
One of their basic tenets is that the nature of man is “basically good”.
God has put a certain libinlaw in my family’s life as a good example of His Truth’s antithesis.
It gives great insight sometimes, to talk with her.
Did you know that people only do evil because they are threatened?
(And just why are the “threateners” acting that way?)
Very well put, CW! Thanks for that.
-— It gives great insight sometimes, to talk with her. -—
That’s probably because you’re a good listener. A couple of my moonbat relatives will talk to me because I’ll listen to them. There’s a difference between the ones who want to lecture you, and the one’s who are lost and confused.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.