Posted on 09/06/2014 9:07:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
America is built on the philosophy of bootstrapping, or pulling yourself up through your own talents and abilities. And no tool is better suited for doing that than a good education.
For years, however, a good primary and secondary education has been increasingly difficult to find. But I’m happy to report, at the start of another school year, that an encouraging trend is underway: School choice is helping more and more children get the best education possible -- and putting the teachers’ unions on notice that the failed status quo is no longer acceptable.
Take the dramatic rise in students participating in school-choice programs. The number taking advantage of options such as vouchers, tuition tax credit programs, and education savings accounts has gone from fewer than 50,000 in 2000 to more than 300,000 today.
And as education expert Virginia Walden Ford notes in the “2014 Index of Culture and Opportunity,” when we consider all school choice options -- deductions for homeschooling expenses, for example -- more than one million children are benefitting from choice in education. That’s quite a jump to occur in just over a decade.
Charter school enrollment is climbing as well. In 1999, fewer than 500,000 students were in such schools, but now the number is closer to two million. From 2001 to 2011, charter-school enrollment increased by about 1.22 million students.
This shouldn’t surprise us one bit. It’s only natural that parents would take advantage of the rise in school choice options to ensure that their kids were in the best schools possible.
The idea that you have no choice but to attend the school closest to where you live, or the school that the “authorities” assign to you, is absurd. And blatantly anti-American, quite frankly. When someone receives a Pell Grant to help finance higher education, the government doesn’t assign him to a college. Why should it be any different for the education that precedes college?
Of course not. Yet something far more important to us -- not only as parents who care about our children but as citizens who care about our country -- is treated as a non-negotiable, take-it-or-leave-it commodity.
That’s why the rise in school choice is such a promising trend. It means that the stranglehold that teachers’ unions still exert on American education is weakening. It means that parents who want the best education possible for their children can pick the best one available, not settle for whatever they’re given, no matter how poor it is.
It’s hard to imagine a more hopeful trend for our nation. As Ford notes, this means children who at one time would have had a very slim chance at succeeding are doing just that. She cites the example of Jordan White, who, after enrolling in a Washington, D.C., private school, went on to graduate from Oberlin College.
“Jordan is now working in Japan as a translator for a large Japanese company,” she writes. “Without the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship she received to attend the school of her choice, Jordan believes that she would not have been so successful.”
There are many more Jordans out there. Ones who are on the path to success because of school choice options, along with many others who will likely fail because they were denied the ability to get the best education possible.
And school choice helps everyone. The children who go to a school of their family’s choosing will obviously benefit, but so will the children who remain in these schools, which must then start competing for students. In short, they’ve got to get better … or go out of business. Unions who want to keep checking boxes may not like this, but it’s good news for everyone else.
We shouldn’t rest until every family is able to pick the best school for their children. We owe it to the Jordans out there. We owe it to their parents. And we owe it to our nation.
Why it is also not illegal for the government to give loans and grants for people to attend private colleges?
Isn't a college grant basically the same as a voucher?
Excellent point, but to understand why we need to understand the history and reason behind government education for K-12.
The “K” is for Kindergarten a German word literally meaning child garden. The Prussians were upset at their Napoleonic losses and blamed weak parenting. The state would raise up good, strong, brave Germans and start as early as possible to prevent parental corruption.
Americans inherited both the above and the British tracking system which the British saw employed in India. The tracking system paralleled the caste system. No need to teach an untouchable what a Brahmin needed to know.
American education was about as free market as ever with teachers paid by concerned and interested parents. With expanded Catholic immigration American Protestants feared Papists would take over the government and so wanted the education to indoctrinate Protestant values into the children of these new immigrants.
Toss in Social Darwinism and the Progressive movement and viola, you have our current witch’s brew of compulsory government education.
Get your children out of the public schools (government indoctrination centers).
I though BHO killed vouchers for DC school children as a favor to his union thugs?
That is why the Socialista, before the turn of the last century initiated public education. This enabled them to control the mass of immigrants, what they knew, what they believed and how eventually they would become worker bees for the state run everything. This stuff is not new. A good education is bad. A bad education is good. Independent thought is anathema to a controlled society.
Mega Bump!
These are your kids we’re talking about. As ForYourChildren wrote above, home school your kids if you can. Then you have complete control over their education. Failing that, enroll them is a quality Conservative Christian school.
arth ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.