Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The low-cost fighters to serve tomorrow’s air forces
BBC Future ^ | 3 September 2014 | Angus Batey

Posted on 09/04/2014 8:17:53 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: pfflier
You little devil, you..

Led me on like a bass!

41 posted on 09/04/2014 9:54:14 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

and if they decided to buy half as many F-35’s.... the total price would not change... no savings


42 posted on 09/04/2014 10:03:08 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
Ewww..side by side seating. Did the IP get to share?

The criteria was keeping it all inside your lips. I passed. No mess. ;)

43 posted on 09/04/2014 10:10:45 AM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (Settled science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Half Vast Conspiracy
Good for you...and your IP.

I wondered if the guy at AFSC that gave us nomex gloves ever thought of that other application when he designed them. I think not or they would have put a clean-out drain on the middle finger.

44 posted on 09/04/2014 10:39:35 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

No guns in the picture. The Scorpion is basically a frame. You can attaché anything you want on it. But in reality it is not a dog fighter.

Regardless buy lots of them. My company is a vendor for Textron.


45 posted on 09/04/2014 12:41:31 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
UAVs today are not autonomous. They are remotely piloted by a human at a videogame console. Lose the link, lose the aircraft.

____________________

http://defense-update.com/products/n/netfires.htm

Canceled program, but it was based on autonomous UAVs - they just called them cruise missiles....:^)

The "man in the loop" was optional.

46 posted on 09/04/2014 3:18:22 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Yes, but one good explosive device could knock them all out and off course. Then one still has several more of those “bombs” for the rest of your little sortie.


47 posted on 09/04/2014 7:35:39 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

There is always something impractical about advancing technology. Something that cannot be accounted for.

One thing that history has taught me, is never be too pessimistic (100 years ago “it’ll never happen”), or optimistic (now, “we can run anything on a wind turbine and it will cost nothing!”). Things never really change. They are only tweaked.


48 posted on 09/04/2014 7:48:49 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

I was thinking guns are needed for ground support in the light attack role.


49 posted on 09/05/2014 5:32:51 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
You are correct about "something can't be accounted for" when it comes to new technologies and only idiots would bet the entire farm and our futures on technologies alone.

But technologies are also a bluff: if we can present the picture of omnipotence thanks to advances, we discourage potential adversaries. Makes 'em have to come up with their technologies to try to overcome our putative advantages - and makes them push their aggressions out to the future.

One example of many was the army "Assault Breaker" munitions of the '70s: thousands of artillery and missile launched smart bomblets that were designed to attack the swarms of Soviet tanks through their thinly-armored turret tops. No one knows if it would have really stopped the 20,000 tanks of the Warsaw Pact but it gave them pause and that's what we really needed.

50 posted on 09/05/2014 6:07:43 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson