Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another U.S. doctor infected with Ebola in Liberia: missionary group
ap ^ | September 2, 2014,

Posted on 09/02/2014 2:01:40 PM PDT by george76

Serving In Mission said that another doctor from the United States was infected with Ebola while treating patients in the obstetrics ward of a hospital in the west African country. Meanwhile, Doctor Without Borders warned that the world is losing the battle against the deadly disease.

...

The situation will likely worsen because restrictions on movement are preventing laborers from getting to farms and the harvest of rice and corn is set to begin in just a few weeks

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cdc; ebola; ebolaoutbreak; ebolavictim

1 posted on 09/02/2014 2:01:40 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m not sure I’d worry about harvesting the crops in those areas. But they are going to need food relief. Otherwise, they are likely to leave the areas in search of food, and some of them will be taking the disease with them.

They need to put the quarantines back in place, but they need to have supplies delivered to the quarantined areas.


2 posted on 09/02/2014 2:18:26 PM PDT by DannyTN (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
they are going to need food relief.

Africa is a lost cause.

The most humane policy would be to let the population die back to a level that can be supported by the local agriculture and food resources.

Food relief keeps people alive who cannot feed themselves

That enables them to have more babies they can't feed

Those babies grow up to be adults who cannot feed themselves.

And on and on and on...


3 posted on 09/02/2014 3:08:16 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Why democrat voters are like sperm: Only 1 in a million work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
"The most humane policy would be to let the population die back to a level that can be supported by the local agriculture and food resources."

That policy is neither humane nor in our best interest. Letting the disease grow unchecked increases the likelihood that it will spread to here. And it increases the likelihood that it will mutate into ever more infectious forms.

Better to put in quarantines and offer relief efforts to keep it contained.

4 posted on 09/02/2014 3:24:21 PM PDT by DannyTN (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Better to put in quarantines and offer relief efforts to keep it contained.

Sure - quarantine is the best option.

But it will never happen.

Political correctness is still paramount.

5 posted on 09/02/2014 3:42:35 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Why democrat voters are like sperm: Only 1 in a million work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Quarantines don't really work with ebola. The most important thing is to isolate the sick and especially the dead. That is a relatively small number of people in any group. Without that it spreads by sewage, by dogs, bats, rats, etc. The next step is obvious, it escapes the quarantine.

The best thing to do is hire lots of locals, wrap them in space suits and comb the cities and countryside for the virus.

6 posted on 09/02/2014 5:20:17 PM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: palmer
"Quarantines don't really work with ebola. The most important thing is to isolate the sick and especially the dead. That is a relatively small number of people in any group. Without that it spreads by sewage, by dogs, bats, rats, etc. The next step is obvious, it escapes the quarantine.

The best thing to do is hire lots of locals, wrap them in space suits and comb the cities and countryside for the virus.

They should do both. I agree with the combing, as that would help stop the spread in the affected community which would save lives and reduce the length of the quarantine.

But they should absolutely quarantine. There is no rationale for allowing this to spread further than it has.

Combing by itself is only going to catch people already showing symptoms and it's going to miss some of them. So you need a quarantine to stop the spread out of the affected areas.

And while they do think it's spread by bats. It requires a bat bite which is rare. I'm not sure that there is evidence that it's spread by dogs and rats. The Congo cases were spread by eating infected game and I wonder if that game had been in the infected areas.

But they have gotten this under control before. Clearly this one is more contagious than what they have dealt with before and they need to step up the game to control it.

An effective quarantine though is going to require humanitarian aid to these areas. Otherwise they are going to break the quarantine in search of food.

7 posted on 09/02/2014 7:42:36 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
The most humane policy would be to let the population die back to a level that can be supported by the local agriculture and food resources.

The Food Luddites, and there is a Free Republic contingent, have managed to place a ban of GMO seeds for all but 4 African countries.

8 posted on 09/02/2014 8:09:55 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
A quicker and better virus test would be great, I'm not sure if that is in the works. The quarantine of various areas is difficult to impossible. The peninsula in or next to Monrovia was a walk in the park compared to areas not surround by water. They dropped it wisely IMO. The problem is not just bringing in quantities of food (which they don't really have), but supplies of all sorts. Trade is extremely important and black markets will spring up if trade is restricted. Then the TP costs $100 a roll, then ebola-guy sneaks through the barrier to go get more to sell.

Perhaps the best compromise I can think of is national borders since they are (supposedly) protected. That way we can keep most countries entirely free and focus our resources on the rest. We would have to get the health care people in and out and a system to air-drop supplies or a keep a port sanitized.

9 posted on 09/03/2014 2:41:57 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson