DNA Tracking a Reality for U.S. Government

Accuracy in Academia ^ | August 29, 2014 | Spencer Irvine

[Academiadotorg]

Do you think the NSA surveillance issue is bad? Wait until you hear about the U.S. government’s DNA tracking program. A 2007 law mandated the collection of blood samples from the heels of newborns to screen for diseases, but an updated part of the law could be used to track children in education. newborn screening

The program, Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007, was reauthorized by the House of Representatives this past June and the Senate in January 2014. The original sponsor was Democratic U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd and was signed in 2008 by President Obama.

The purpose of the program was to screen newborns, but according to The Heartland Institute newsletter, “The new bill would collect each newborn’s DNA in federal databases for subsequent medical research and, in Rhode Island, track its owners’ education progress. The article, titled, “U.S. House Oks Funding for DNA Tracking Program,” also spoke of how Rhode Island officials denied that the information was being kept and not discarded.

Rhode Island received a Race to the Top grant, and in its application, said it would link the blood testing to tracking children’s academic progress. The grant was given to the state by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services totaling $50 million in 2011. And, adding to concern, no parental consent is required in this program, which is only operating in Rhode Island.

Also, this law’s renewal will cost $80 million between the years 2015 to 2019, says the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The CBO’s estimates are typically underestimates, and in their own words, “assuming appropriation of necessary amounts.”

The specific mandates from this law are:

Screening these samples and placing them into a national database Giving grants to states to conduct research, give counsel and provide services to newborns and children that have or are at risk of getting certain diseases Developing and promoting educational material on screening and follow-up visits “Expands the duties” of the “Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases” that would make recommendations on expanding screening and creating a “decision-matrix” of the screenings Keeping an updated “central clearinghouse of current information on newborn screening” Maintaining quality assurance and quality control of the newborn screenings Collecting data on the newborn screenings and making it available for research Creating “a national contingency plan for newborn screening” Continuing to innovate and help identifying treatments and experiments that would help improve screening technology

[Go_Raiders]

Good. Now make it mandatory for immigrants, convicted felons and any suspect in a sexual assault case with a court order from a judge, regardless of whether there’s DNA evidence in the pending investigation.

[Vince Ferrer]

We are at Gattaca now.

[Don Corleone]

1984 is here with a vengeance.

[Liberty Tree Surgeon]

So a site that claims to call for “accuracy” indicates Obama was signing this into law before he took the oath of office in January 2009?

[bert]

OOPs..... bad move.

They may get results they don’t want to see.