In March 2013, she released a video endorsing same-sex marriage both “personally and as a matter of policy and law.”
Evolution?
HELLry has been a homosexual for decades and that lifestyle includes her longtime “wife”, Huma, the al-queda terrorist.
Hillary = Benghazi blood on her hands. Nothing else matters, IMO.
Another fat, ugly, liberal shrew turns to lesbianism because no decent man would touch her with a 20 foot snake hook.
islamist nights with huma.....
Hillary was low profile in college, she was a plain dresser, she didn’t stand out, she was known as a student who could give speeches and she was also thought to be a lesbian. This from a former classmate via one of my classmates this past weekend. Its amazing what is out there, and yet there are no followups. Especially her attitude towards blacks when they were in Arkansas. Vote for the Myth folks and see what you get. (I know there are no Hillary supporters here.)
In 1993, gays celebrated the fact that one of their own had finally made it to the White House.
Ah! Who can forget those huge, topless, lesbians sitting on blankets basking in the sun as seen on C-SPAN?
PUKE!
If anyone thinks this is going to affect Hillary negatively, you are dreaming. The faggofascists will support anyone who is willing to persecute Christians, regardless of anything else. Same with the feminazis.
The only thing that will actually stop these people, I’m afraid to say, is armed revolution and putting a constitutional jackboot on their vile throats
As mentioned in related threads, please consider the following. As a consequence of parents not making sure that their children are being taught why the Founding States enumerated certain protections into the Constitution, we're now dealing with the following situation.
Voters are not catching on to the problem that regardless of PC, pro-gay interpretations of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protections Clause (EPC) by activist judges and corrupt politicians, power-grabbing politicians like Hillary Clinton (Obama II) are wrongly ignoring that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect her vote-winning commitment to support so-called gay "rights."
In fact, the states are free to make laws which discriminate against gay "rights," imo, as long as such laws don't also unreasonably abridge rights enumerated in the Constitution by the states.
If Clinton really wants to protect gay rights then she must do the following. Clinton must inspire Congress to propose a gay rights amendment to the Constitution to the states. And if the states choose to ratify Clinton's amendment, then gay rights will be constitutionally enumerated and Clinton will be a hero.
Regarding the EPC mentioned above, note that John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (14A), and also the Supreme Court, have clarified that the amendment did not create any new protections, but stengthens enumerated protections which the states amend to the Constitution.
“Mr. Speaker, this House may safely follow the example of the makers of the Constitution and the builders of the Republic, by passing laws for enforcing all the privileges and immunities of the United States as guaranteed by the amended Constitution and expressly enumerated in the Constitution [emphasis added].” — Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 42nd Congress, 1st Session. (See lower half of third column.)
“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.
Again, since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the gay agenda, gay "rights" are not constitutionally protected regardless of 14A.