Florida court won't delay same-sex marriage appeals

Local 10 (ABC Miami) ^ | 8/28/14

[SoFloFreeper]

A Miami-based appeals court has rejected Attorney General Pam Bondi's request that two gay marriage cases be delayed until the U.S. Supreme Court decides the issue nationally.

The Third District Court of Appeal ruled Thursday that the cases from Miami-Dade and Monroe counties will move forward.

[SoFloFreeper]

The Miami media is dancing around the May pole.

[George from New England]

SEND IN THE SHERIFFS AND DEPUTIES. THIS IS B-—S-—.

[manc]

always judges down in the south east part of this state.

Those three counties should make their own state.

[Ray76]

The Florida Constitution defines marriage as one man & one woman.

That’s the law.

[greene66]

The rule of law seems quite dead in America these days.

I truly think we are entering our country’s end times.

[Paulie]

Well, well. Pam thought she was clever to request a stay until SCOTUS weighed in. She thought she dodged a bullet.

Now it is time to do some heavy lifting for the people of the Sunshine State, Ms. Bondi. It's the people vs the homosexual mafia.

We'll be watching.

[Amendment10]

"The Florida Constitution defines marriage as one man & one woman."

Beware of activist justices "establishing" case precedents that the Court has already historically established precedents for.

For example, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect so-called gay rights. So the states are free to make laws which discriminate against gay marriage as long as such laws don't unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.

In fact, regarding pro-gay, PC interpretations of the 14th Amendment's (14A) Equal Protections Clause, please consider the following. Not only did John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of 14A, clarify in the congressional record that the amendment applied only enumerated rights to the states, but the Supreme Court has also essentially said the same thing.

• “Mr. Speaker, this House may safely follow the example of the makers of the Constitution and the builders of the Republic, by passing laws for enforcing all the privileges and immunities of the United States as guaranteed by the amended Constitution and expressly enumerated in the Constitution [emphasis added].” — Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 42nd Congress, 1st Session. (See lower half of third column.)

• “3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.

Again, since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay rights, there are no enumerated protections for the gay agenda to be applied to the states by 14A.

But this doesn't stop activist judges and corrupt lawmakers from taking advantange of widespread, inexcusable ignorance of 10th Amendment-protected powers versus enumerated rights, bluffing such rights for political gain, especially to win votes.

[George from New England]

We need research ...

How many of these pervert judges are Crist appointments ???

Hummnm

[Delta Dawn]

Now that a federal judge in Utah has issued a ruling that decriminalizes polygamy, the pedophiles of the world are feeling pretty good tonight...

[Ray76]

Fight.