Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfony1

Have you noted Mitch’s latest add:

“Mitch McConnell has a game plan to confront President Barack Obama with a stark choice next year: Accept bills reining in the administration’s policies or veto them and risk a government shutdown.”

Really? You are buying this load of horse crap? He could have done that as minority leader and yet he did your preemptive surrender thing on about every issue coming and going. Do you honestly believe the crap he is shoveling?

With no election pending Mitch would vote yes in a heart beat and if he did vote no would make sure enough of his fellow travelers would take up the slack. Mitch is about power, $$$ and himself. Kentuckians well they go to the back of the bus and the country is the least of his concerns.

What you haven’t figured out is you have already surrendered, you are going to vote Republican for Mitch, a man is not a conservative and has made it abundantly clear he detests conservatives. Mitch is not going to fight for conservatives issues, he has made that clear time and time again. He is a Republican and a liberal one at that.

You have preemptively surrendered to liberalism, not as radical as most but liberalism aka the Party, still the same.


15 posted on 08/20/2014 10:43:44 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: sarge83

Hi Sarge,

When the Founders agreed that Congress would act in accordance with various motions approved by “the majority”, the “minority” lost its power to “rule”.

And so, when the Senate adopted “rules” to guide how it would conduct its business, those “rules” were designed to make it easy for the “majority” party in the Senate to control the agenda of the Senate. The result now is a Harry Reid enabled catastrophe.

So I say, let’s give Mitch a chance to show us what he can do when HE has the power to set the agenda for the Senate.

If America elects enough truly Conservative Senators, the “majority” of those Senators will have the power to remove Mitch — if THEY decide that is appropriate.

I feel confident that, if Jim DeMint had to chose between voting for Mitch or voting for Mitch’s Democrat opponent, Jim would vote for Mitch. You may disagree.

Do you also think that Eric Holder’s “experience” as Banana’s consigliore makes him a “good” choice for our next Supreme Court Justice?

Yes. Winning control of the Senate is THAT important!


18 posted on 08/20/2014 12:08:44 PM PDT by pfony1 (Add just 6 GOP Senators and we "bury" Harry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson