Hi Sarge,
When the Founders agreed that Congress would act in accordance with various motions approved by “the majority”, the “minority” lost its power to “rule”.
And so, when the Senate adopted “rules” to guide how it would conduct its business, those “rules” were designed to make it easy for the “majority” party in the Senate to control the agenda of the Senate. The result now is a Harry Reid enabled catastrophe.
So I say, let’s give Mitch a chance to show us what he can do when HE has the power to set the agenda for the Senate.
If America elects enough truly Conservative Senators, the “majority” of those Senators will have the power to remove Mitch — if THEY decide that is appropriate.
I feel confident that, if Jim DeMint had to chose between voting for Mitch or voting for Mitch’s Democrat opponent, Jim would vote for Mitch. You may disagree.
Do you also think that Eric Holder’s “experience” as Banana’s consigliore makes him a “good” choice for our next Supreme Court Justice?
Yes. Winning control of the Senate is THAT important!
I seem to remember Mitch and his crew of eunuchs had control of the senate from what 2002 through 2006, how did that work out for us? Same bunch had control from 1995 to 2000 how did that work out for us? From 1995-2006 we got Sam Alito and nothing else but more big government tripe.
Eventually you have to realize the GOPE is not friends of any conservative unless they are willing to work their butts off for the Party, give $$$ freely with no strings attached, vote as they are told and then shut the hell up. Do these things and you can be in the Party, do them not well you are labeled a racist, kkk member, radical kook by these people who claim to want you in their Big Tent.
I am more than willing to vote for any candidate who can deliver 70/30 conservative but at some point you have to realize we are not even getting 5/95 out of the GOPE bunch. Oh they talk a good game, but look at their track record, they don’t even attempt to walk the walk.