Sarge,
Sorry, but I don’t believe that pre-emptive surrender is sosmehow “more virtuous” or more praise-worthuy than a good faith effort for a difficult “win”.
I admit there is a chance that McConnell “might” vote to “confirm” Holder.
I’d like you to admit that there is NO chance that Grimes would NOT vote to “confirm” Holder.
If I believed that, then I would have “lost” before
Have you noted Mitch’s latest add:
“Mitch McConnell has a game plan to confront President Barack Obama with a stark choice next year: Accept bills reining in the administration’s policies or veto them and risk a government shutdown.”
Really? You are buying this load of horse crap? He could have done that as minority leader and yet he did your preemptive surrender thing on about every issue coming and going. Do you honestly believe the crap he is shoveling?
With no election pending Mitch would vote yes in a heart beat and if he did vote no would make sure enough of his fellow travelers would take up the slack. Mitch is about power, $$$ and himself. Kentuckians well they go to the back of the bus and the country is the least of his concerns.
What you haven’t figured out is you have already surrendered, you are going to vote Republican for Mitch, a man is not a conservative and has made it abundantly clear he detests conservatives. Mitch is not going to fight for conservatives issues, he has made that clear time and time again. He is a Republican and a liberal one at that.
You have preemptively surrendered to liberalism, not as radical as most but liberalism aka the Party, still the same.