“You’re seeing what I’m seeing - based on the pictures, it wasn’t a back shot.
Evidently the ‘witness’ who described MB being shot in the back while his hands were up, was the fellow who robbed the store with MB so of course he would be the most reliable, truthful, believable witness you could find .... NOT.”
***************************************************************************************
Well the YUTE “eyewitness” clearly isn’t intelligent enough to know that a statement that a person was shot in the back could be quickly proven to be false by physical evidence.
This low-IQ Yute actually needs to be lawyering up himself at this point.
He has Trayvon’s lawyer
.... a statement that a person was shot in the back could be quickly proven to be false by physical evidence.
***************************
Neither one was too “intelligent” so this doesn’t surprise me .... robbing a store in the first place for a stupid starter. MB makes a good BOLO because he’s distinctive, just from his size. If he were not “guilty” (and he knew he’d done something wrong), he probably would have stopped, talked to the officer & it would have ended up ok. He knew he’d robbed the store and being young, stupid and guilty, figured he’s ‘get away’ or whatever else he was thinking. Maybe he freaked out if the officer was trying to put him in cuffs .... that happens. Lots of “stupid stuff” going on (gee ... where have I heard that phrase before?????).