Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A plan to save Iraq from ISIS and Iran
American Enterprise Institute (byline WSJ) ^ | June 17, 2014 | Jack Keane, Danielle Pletka

Posted on 08/12/2014 11:48:56 PM PDT by Jack Black

The Middle East is in a downward spiral. More than 160,000 have died in Syria's civil war, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, aka ISIS, has captured key Iraqi cities and is marching on Baghdad, and the security investments made by the U.S. over the past decade—like them or not—are being frittered away.

It is still possible to reverse the recent gains of ISIS, an outgrowth of what was once al Qaeda in Iraq. The group's fighters number only in the thousands, and while well-armed, they lack the accoutrements of a serious military. But only the United States can provide the necessary military assistance for Baghdad to beat back our shared enemy.

Setting aside for the moment the question of whether this administration has the will to intervene again in Iraq, here are the components of a reasonable military package that can make a difference:

ISIS has made extraordinary progress in recent weeks in Iraq and controls large swaths of territory in northern Syria. But its forces are not impregnable and their tactics are not terribly complicated. ISIS has progressed via two main routes in Iraq, traveling during the day in columns. Its forces and staging areas are exposed targets—but the Iraqis have very limited air power.

Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and some of the necessary target development have already begun on the Iraq side; the U.S. needs to expand them to the Syria side of the Iraqi-Syrian border. We need to know more about who is moving, how they're moving, who is helping, and how to stop them. This target information will assist air interdiction and non-American ground forces to counter ISIS.

The next necessary step is air interdiction of ISIS staging areas, supplies, sanctuaries and lines of communication. To be effective, this must address targets in both Iraq and Syria. Air interdiction alone will not achieve a victory, but it is a necessary component for follow-on ground operations. And hitting ISIS in Iraq without hitting it in Syria will allow the enemy to reserve its strength for another effort.

President Obama is reportedly considering providing elements of the Free Syrian Army with weaponry and other tools to begin to push back on both Iranian-backed Syrian forces and al Qaeda and Gulf-backed Islamist extremists. Remember, the Free Syrian Army (FSA) is the only force in Syria that has attacked ISIS. The Assad regime and ISIS enjoy a cordial entente and do not attack each other. Should President Obama choose to do so, air interdiction against targets inside Syria will be a boost that allows FSA moderates to gain ground they have lost over the past year.

After interdiction, the next step will be providing air cover. As the terrorists and Iraqi Security Forces face each other, the Iraqis are going to need close U.S. air support. That means coordination with ground forces, a task that was simpler with U.S. troops on the ground in Iraq, but is now substantially more complex. Iraqis cannot facilitate our targeting.

Without air-ground controllers, this requires U.S. special forces to assist the locals. Far from the "boots on the ground" meme that has been so vilified in Washington, this is a job for which special forces have been trained. It is not combat, but it is the kind of partnership and facilitation that should have been left in place once the bulk of our troops left Iraq in 2011. These are all arms-length measures, and they will likely stop the advance of ISIS on the ground in Iraq. Air power will also help to defend Baghdad and interdict ISIS, but at some point there will need to be a counteroffensive to take back land now held by the enemy.

The largely Shiite forces that make up the Iraqi army cannot win alone, especially as Sunni extremists join forces with ISIS. They must turn to Kurdish Peshmerga troops for assistance. This will not be an easy choice for the Kurdish leadership. But the Kurdistan Regional Government is playing with fire if it believes that ISIS and its ilk are the road to a more stable Middle East. A fragmented Iraq based on terrorist rule will not enable continuity of oil supplies or security for Kurdish population centers.

The Syrians and the Iraqis have made their own beds—so why stick our noses in now? The answer is that al Qaeda, ISIS and others will not stop at Iraq and Syria. Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Turkey, Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and others will be next.

Think subcontracting the job to Iran is the right all? Surely, no one wishes a Middle East managed by the ayatollahs in Tehran. Don't care? Remember the admonition of the 9/11 Commission:

"The most important failure was one of imagination."
Imagine what controlling vast areas of the Middle East will do for extremists of all stripes.

Yes, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has failed dismally to include Sunnis in Iraq's government, military and economy—with disastrous effects. Nonetheless, President Obama's formulation—that the U.S. will provide assistance only if Mr. Maliki makes necessary reforms—assumes that we have some leverage over Baghdad. To the contrary, Washington will earn far more leverage if it is willing to step in and provide the kind of support that should have been there in the years after victory.

Only then will Mr. Obama have the influence and the trust to bring together Iraqis to reconstitute a foundation that can withstand the predations of ISIS, Iran and others.

Are these prescriptions a guarantee of victory? No. Are Iraqis and Syrians and all their neighbors worthy of another American investment? That's not the right question. This is not just about them. This is about the security of the U.S., our allies and our vital interests. If we do nothing—if our imagination fails us once again—it is the American people who again will pay a terrible price. Weighed against the limited requirements to help Iraqis and Syrians fight for themselves, that is well worth the effort.

Gen. Keane, a retired four-star general and former vice chief of staff of the U.S. Army, is the chairman of the Institute for the Study of War.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: daniellepletka; freesyrianarmy; iraq; isis; islam; jackkeane; kurdistan; lebanon; russia; syria; waronterror; yazidi; yazidis
I think the article overlooks the sectarian nature of the conflict. Admittedly ISIS are the worst actors in the region, but to side with the Shiites over the Sunis will reverberate throughout the region, I'm not sure it is the smart play.
1 posted on 08/12/2014 11:48:56 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

I suggest incinerating Teheran—merely to get someone’s attention.


2 posted on 08/13/2014 12:00:14 AM PDT by Misterioso (Obama is our first postmodern president. Philosophy is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Whatever Obama does, you can count on it being the wrong thing.


3 posted on 08/13/2014 12:01:20 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

I think we should support the Kurds and Israelis, and covertly encourage everyone else in the region to slaughter each other.


4 posted on 08/13/2014 12:08:13 AM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
A plan to save Iraq from ISIS and Iran

Nuke at 10,000 degrees till islam is no more.

5 posted on 08/13/2014 12:32:54 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Read history.

Islam surges outward, meets resistance, interprets their not conquering all like they did for the first few hundred years as a failure to practice "pure" Iz Lame, then turns inwards and the Muze Lames slaughter one another in huge numbers.

The critical resistance was Egypt. The Egyptian military kept its' cool letting the protests run long enough to make sure they had identified all or nearly all the leadership down to the lowest levels.

Once they felt they had enough information they came down hard and I doubt the executions that have been publicly admitted to are more than a quarter of the number of Muslim Brotherhood people in Egypt who have been executed.

When jihad falters in the face of Muslim resistance, it always turns inwards with a vengeance.

ISIS is not the last of the groups of rabid dogs we'll see declaring the Caliphate and demanding obedience, nor is it the largest we'll see. It's just the first manifestation of the cannibalistic phase jihad goes through every time it tries to recreate the Caliphate.

JMHO

6 posted on 08/13/2014 1:16:27 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

these guys have to be defeated in detail before they can brainwash all the kids in the conquered areas .
This is what Hamas has done ; brainwash the kids .
This cycle has to be stopped . The last thing the world need is a whole new generation of little brainwashed jihad zombies to have to kill off .


7 posted on 08/13/2014 1:28:51 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

“Whatever Obama does, you can count on it being the wrong thing.”...........

When and if he ever gets off the golf course and campaign trail.


8 posted on 08/13/2014 2:38:33 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Thanks, thoughtful reply.


9 posted on 08/13/2014 8:10:11 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

There’s only one worthwhile objective, and that is free and independent Kurdistan, carved out of Iraq, Iran, Turkey, and Syria.


10 posted on 08/16/2014 9:38:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson