Posted on 08/11/2014 5:47:24 AM PDT by wagglebee
But only if the infanticide is carried out directly by the mother with her own two hands, if she doesn’t want the kid, the doctor delivers it, then leaves the room, she then has the option of putting it in baby basket (where it will be taken to an adoption agency), or strangling it to death with her OWN two hands. (with the caveat that she do it within 12 hours of the birth).
Is this sarcasm? ]
Is this?
I doubt you are actually pro life. You’re showing yourself too smart by half. A Solomon you ain’t, sweetie. And in your foolishness you imply that Solomon would have sliced the baby in half, that his intention was like yours, to serve the agenda at any cost regardless of the life destroyed. You’re a fraud with too big an ego to admit you are fumbling the metaphors.
[ I doubt you are actually pro life. You’re showing yourself too smart by half.]
So you are calling pro-life people dumb by that statement? (I can jump to conclusuions too).
[ A Solomon you ain’t, sweetie. And in your foolishness you imply that Solomon would have sliced the baby in half, that his intention was like yours, to serve the agenda at any cost regardless of the life destroyed.]
Everyone Knows Solomon wasn’t actually going to cut the baby in half, what he did was present such a horrible option that the TRUTH could be easily seen by the judge, which was himself. Am I not presenting an option that that is horrible that the BASE LEVEL TRUTH that Abortion is Infanticide be easily seen by the Judge (Most of the Sane Citizenry). By the way “sweetie”, ingatiating yourself will not gain my favor either, “pal”.
[ You’re a fraud with too big an ego to admit you are fumbling the metaphors. ]
Really well thank you Dr. Freud for you Pycho anaylsys... I hope you make plenty listening to people on couches. Also it is not a metaphor, it is a Analogy based on historical references.
Now to humble myself, I did make the mistake using the beigining line of “I am Pro-Infanticide” as a tool of SHOCK VALUE. Perhapse I should not have done so, maybe I should have approached it from another subtle angle.
CHILDREN ARE STILL BEING MURDERED and we are arguing in the bushes about “When life begins” with the libs, why not confront the Truth about it? No greater way to EXPOSE the Truth than taking away the veneer of civilisation (ie. Doctors and procedures) we have placed upon this barbaric act to hide that fact that it is a BARBARIC ACT.
does this qualify as mind reading and a personal attack ?
It’s an opinion. Does your ‘tattletale behavior qualify as ‘stalking’? LOL
Respectfully, I think you were channeling Jonathan Swift, not Solomon ...
:-)
In addition to Roe and Doe, people should really read Blackmun’s papers that were released following his death. Specifically the ones on the Casey Decision (I think) documenting his discussions to swing Anthony Kennedy’s support for upholding Roe.
Together, the decisions and papers show that the guy was a pro abortion zealot way out of synch with society as a whole. The only conclusion that I can come to is that he was really a closet eugenecist along the lines of Margaret Sanger. There’s just no other plausible explanation for his opinions.
Astute conclusion ... he wrote that he was ‘influenced’ by the wishes of his daughter regarding abortion on demand. But I suspect he was on the court because of, ultimately, Agenda 21.
It was answered on the thread.
This isn’t the Religion Forum, so mindreading isn’t disallowed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.