The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarter's Expenses?
Posted on 08/11/2014 5:47:24 AM PDT by wagglebee
It is even used by a lot of people who label themselves conservatives to discretely support abortion.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
The oligarchs controlling democrat politicians want more dead humans, not less. Killing the ‘less desirable’ members of the human species is a goal in the agenda 21 driven dead souls. The evil of it is so exposed that those being exploited to carry out the evil don't even recognize how they are being manipulated. Democrats have been so successful in slaughtering the posterity of black people that now these democrip oligarchs must create invasions of Hispanics to fill the voting roles which are in danger of being 'out voted'.
The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarter's Expenses?
When the late “justice” Blackmun went slithering into Hell, he instantly changed to being pro-life....but it was FOREVER TOO LATE!
When Roe was passed even the pro-aborts could not believe that they got abortion - nine full months.
When Roe, the lie of greatest degree, was passed, it was legal to terminate a pregnancy in all the states on the decision of the attending physician that the pregnancy endangered the life of the mother. Those behind the great lies told to get Roe passed had ‘other’ goals in mind, namely control of less desirable population groups and utilitarian killing in the name of enlightened social order.
How the heck can the Supreme Court do that?!?!
The Constitution is the Constitution and the SC can determine whether something lines up with it, but they cannot violate it.
They can't overrule the states rights clause.
I am anti-abortion, pro infanticide.
But only if the infanticide is carried out directly by the mother with her own two hands, if she doesn’t want the kid, the doctor delivers it, then leaves the room, she then has the option of putting it in baby basket (where it will be taken to an adoption agency), or strangling it to death with her OWN two hands. (with the caveat that she do it within 12 hours of the birth).
We have turned doctor’s into hitmen called abortionists.
Make the mother make the call and make her do the deed herself, the progrssives love nature so much and like to equate humans with animals, this is another great way for them to bear their fruits and choke on them. Animal mothers in the wild will eat their own young, is it too much to ask for a human mother to stangle her own unwanted child on her own? You know they want their moral equivalence... Give it to them, but make it so unpalatable that “abortion, which is infanticide under another name, becomes truly rare”.
Stop the staining of another’s hands for such an evil deed.
Treat it like it truly is..
[ When Roe was passed even the pro-aborts could not believe that they got abortion - nine full months. ]
And people are afraid of an article V convention of tyhe states to try to reign in the Supreme Court with term limits and majority states veto of Supreme court decisions.....
I have to laugh at that...
Welcome to the ongoing constitutional convention that is the Supreme Court, the nine not-so-wisemen and hags that control our destiny...
[ In Roe vs. Wade’s companion case, Doe vs. Bolton, the High Court squashed the states’ right to make third trimester abortions illegal.
How the heck can the Supreme Court do that?!?!
The Constitution is the Constitution and the SC can determine whether something lines up with it, but they cannot violate it.
They can’t overrule the states rights clause. ]
Ha Ha, the Supreme Court is an ongoing CON-CON influenced by CON-MEN....
[ When Roe, the lie of greatest degree, was passed, it was legal to terminate a pregnancy in all the states on the decision of the attending physician that the pregnancy endangered the life of the mother. Those behind the great lies told to get Roe passed had ‘other’ goals in mind, namely control of less desirable population groups and utilitarian killing in the name of enlightened social order. ]
Indeed, the lie that it was needed to protect the mother’s life was already handled by conventinal medical ethics. In their quest to to remove respinsibility FROM the mother to a question of CONVEINENCE for the mother, they turned a whole generation of Doctors in HITMEN.
Abortion to protect as mother’s life was already a very rare thing indeed, the Lie of Roe v. Wade was to supposedly make it “Safe and Rare” did neither.
You are pro-infanticide?... Maybe you should take a closer look at that ...
[ You are pro-infanticide?... Maybe you should take a closer look at that ... ]
Did you read my entire post? My position is to present a “solomon’s choice” to the society at large and make it such a disgusting thing that it would make both illegal.
I am anti-abortion, pro infanticide. But only if the infanticide is carried out directly by the mother with her own two hands,
So you are pro-infanticide if it fits your agenda?
She just explained what she meant; she is obviously using it as a literary device to try to motivate women not to kill their own babies.
[ From post #8, quoting you :
I am anti-abortion, pro infanticide. But only if the infanticide is carried out directly by the mother with her own two hands,
So you are pro-infanticide if it fits your agenda? ]
But WHY?
Read My whole post please and try to THINK WHY I am making this point.
[ But only if the infanticide is carried out directly by the mother with her own two hands, if she doesn’t want the kid, the doctor delivers it, then leaves the room, she then has the option of putting it in baby basket (where it will be taken to an adoption agency), or strangling it to death with her OWN two hands. (with the caveat that she do it within 12 hours of the birth).
We have turned doctor’s into hitmen called abortionists.
Make the mother make the call and make her do the deed herself, the progrssives love nature so much and like to equate humans with animals, this is another great way for them to bear their fruits and choke on them. Animal mothers in the wild will eat their own young, is it too much to ask for a human mother to stangle her own unwanted child on her own? You know they want their moral equivalence... Give it to them, but make it so unpalatable that “abortion, which is infanticide under another name, becomes truly rare”.
Stop the staining of another’s hands for such an evil deed.
Treat it like it truly is.. ]
Society has been shielded from the fact that Abortion IS Infaticide. It has been shielded from this due to the fact that the Abortion Process as carried out like a medical procedure has “sanitized” the process of Infanticide in the public conciousness.
A couple of points:
1. Abortion “Doctors” have become legal hitman hired for conveinince.
2. People have been disconnected formt he process, especially the mothers that are talked into the process by their family, friends, and lovers because it is easy to talk someone into getting a supposed safe edical procedure. How hard would it be for them to talk someone into strangling their own baby to death with their own two hands vs. giving the child up for adoption? A HELL OF A LOT HARDER.
3. I am NOT actually PRO-INFANTICIDE, I said that for shock value you see so that you could read my post and realize that society at large will need to be grabbed by the lapel and shook back into sanity and mabye slapped around a bit.
4. If we made pre-birth infanticide ILLEGAL on the caveat that Post-Birth Infanticide by the mother’s own hands legal, it wouldn’t stay legal for long as people might actually wake the hell up and realize abortion for what it really is.
5. Are you calling Solomon a child killer for ordering the baby be cut in half? (think about it).
My position is a Society wide “Solomon’s Argument” on the subject of Abortion as a way to End the barbaric practice once and for all.
[ So you are pro-infanticide if it fits your agenda?
She just explained what she meant; she is obviously using it as a literary device to try to motivate women not to kill their own babies. ]
Thank you for thinking! I appreciate it! And you summed up my intent very aptly.
But only if the infanticide is carried out directly by the mother with her own two hands, if she doesn’t want the kid, the doctor delivers it, then leaves the room, she then has the option of putting it in baby basket (where it will be taken to an adoption agency), or strangling it to death with her OWN two hands. (with the caveat that she do it within 12 hours of the birth).
Is this sarcasm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.